2020 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) 2020
DOI: 10.1109/cvpr42600.2020.01099
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Unsupervised Person Re-Identification via Multi-Label Classification

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
226
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 369 publications
(226 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
226
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As the popular technology in unlabeled pedestrian image re-id, many researches [3], [17], [18], [20], [30], [40], [46], [48] [30] formulated an unsupervised multi-label classification for per-…”
Section: ) Comparison With Unsupervised Clustering Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As the popular technology in unlabeled pedestrian image re-id, many researches [3], [17], [18], [20], [30], [40], [46], [48] [30] formulated an unsupervised multi-label classification for per-…”
Section: ) Comparison With Unsupervised Clustering Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This paper conducts comparison between unsupervised domain adaptation (UDA) [5], [7], [8], [16], [23] and clustering methods [3], [17], [18], [20], [30], [40], [46], [48]. The re-id results of these methods are reported in it proposed a multi-task dictionary learning method to learn a dataset-shared but target-data-biased person representation, which outperforms the former state-of-the-arts; Li et al [16] exploited useful knowledge of pre-existing labeled data from…”
Section: Comparison With the State-of-the-artsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MAR [23] learned a soft multi-label from an auxiliary domain to learn identity-discriminative features. MMCL [24] predicted the image label by pair-wise similarity and conducted multi-label classification for feature learning. UDAP [25] proposed a self-training framework and provided a theoretical analysis on UDA re-ID.…”
Section: Related Work a Discriminative Learning Without Identitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We compare our proposed A 2 G framework with unsupervised, unsupervised domain adaptation, and attribute auxiliary weakly-supervised methods on four cross-dataset person re-ID tasks: Duke-to-Market, Market-to-Duke, MSMTto-Duke, and MSMT-to-Market. We compare three types of approaches, including unsupervised learning methods: PUAL [45], BUC [16], SSL [10], HCT [46], D-MMD [49], CSE [10], and TAUDL [47], transfer learning based methods: SPGAN [20], HHL [22], CFSM [48], ENC [15], UDATP [25], UCDA-CCE [50], PDA-Net [51], PCB-PAST [8], SSG [7], MMCL [24], DG-NET++ [52], B-SNR+GDS-H [53], DGNET [3], OG-Net [54], AE [17], and AD-Cluster [55], and attribute auxiliary weakly supervised method: TJ-AIDL [26].…”
Section: Comparison With the State-of-the-artsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(ii) Label prediction methods: Cross-View Asymmetric Metric Learning (CAMEL) [28], Progressive Unsupervised Learning (PUL) [29], MultiAble Learning (MAR) [19], Multi-view Clustering Method (MCM) [30], Transductive Semi-Supervised Metric (TSSML) Learning [31], Unsupervised Graph Association (UGA) [32], Memory-based Multilabel Classification Loss method (MMCL) [33].…”
Section: Comparison To The-state-of-the-artsmentioning
confidence: 99%