2017
DOI: 10.1117/12.2254139
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Unsupervised quantification of abdominal fat from CT images using Greedy Snakes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Older methods utilize classical image processing and binary morphological operations [23][24][25] in order to isolate the SAT and VAT from total adipose tissue (TAT). Other studies use prior knowledge about contours and shapes and actively fit a contour or template to a given CT image [26][27][28][29][30]. Those methods are prone to variations in intensity values and assume certain body structures for algorithmic separation between SAT and VAT.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Older methods utilize classical image processing and binary morphological operations [23][24][25] in order to isolate the SAT and VAT from total adipose tissue (TAT). Other studies use prior knowledge about contours and shapes and actively fit a contour or template to a given CT image [26][27][28][29][30]. Those methods are prone to variations in intensity values and assume certain body structures for algorithmic separation between SAT and VAT.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main barrier for adoption of CT body composition analysis into clinical practice is the lack of accurate fully automated segmentation techniques. Several fully automated techniques have been proposed in the last decade, including threshold-based approaches (10-15) and atlas-based approaches (16)(17)(18)(19); however, the heterogeneous appearance of the abdomen, such as the thin muscle wall, or the similar intensity of gastrointestinal contents to adipose tissue makes this a challenging task.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several fully automated segmentation methods to assess body composition using CT examinations have been proposed; however, limitations of traditional image-processing techniques and the complexity of abdominal imaging have prevented widespread use. Adipose tissue is primarily identified with threshold-based techniques (10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15), and atlasbased techniques are used to isolate the abdominal muscles (16)(17)(18)(19). However, anatomic variability in the abdomen poses a substantial challenge to automated segmentation, and manual correction is almost always required.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our previous work [ 23 ] describes the algorithm in great detail; here, we just briefly review the main steps. We formulated automatic fat quantification as an unsupervised contour minimization problem.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We also calculated visceral-to-subcutaneous fat ratios (VSRs) and visceral-to-total fat ratios (VTRs) using VAT and SAT. This algorithm identified TAT, VAT, and SAT segmentations with 0.885%, 3.55%, and 3.26% average error, respectively, as compared to a manual segmentation [ 23 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%