2004
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-27814-6_28
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Unsupervised Text Segmentation Using Color and Wavelet Features

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It has been demonstrated in [9] that the segmentation and the subsequent steps perform better on a higher resolution than on the original video frame resolution of 72 dpi. Furthermore, the segmentation algorithm performs better, if the text is not too small.…”
Section: Resolution Enhancementmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…It has been demonstrated in [9] that the segmentation and the subsequent steps perform better on a higher resolution than on the original video frame resolution of 72 dpi. Furthermore, the segmentation algorithm performs better, if the text is not too small.…”
Section: Resolution Enhancementmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The text image which gives the best recognition performance is considered as the output of the system. Gllavata et al [9] regard the text segmentation problem as a clustering process. As in [12], the possible text and background color is defined.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This led to a plethora of methods that are surveyed by Jung et al (2004). The work conducted in the authors' workgroup includes proposals for text detection (Gllavata/Ewerth/Freisleben, 2004a) and text segmentation (Gllavata/Ewerth/Stefi/Freisleben, 2004;Gllavata/Freisleben, 2005) as well as a method for tracking moving text across several video frames (Gllavata/Ewerth/Freisleben, 2004b). The proposed text segmentation method was able to boost the word (character) recognition rate from 62% to 79% (76% to 91%) on a set of test images (Gllavata/Freisleben, 2005).…”
Section: Detection and Recognition Of Superimposed Textmentioning
confidence: 99%