2013
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-31552-7_83
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Unsymmetrical Trimmed Midpoint as Detector for Salt and Pepper Noise Removal

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Where r refers to Original image, n gives the corrupted image, x denotes restored image, M x N is the size of Processed image [13]. The existing algorithms used for the comparison are SMF, AMF, CWF, TDF, PSMF, DPF for comparing Fixed value impulse noise.…”
Section: Simulation Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Where r refers to Original image, n gives the corrupted image, x denotes restored image, M x N is the size of Processed image [13]. The existing algorithms used for the comparison are SMF, AMF, CWF, TDF, PSMF, DPF for comparing Fixed value impulse noise.…”
Section: Simulation Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Resulting array is sorted in a snake like order. The procedure is repeated for the other windows of the image [13].…”
Section: Snake Like Improved Shear Sortingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The trimming was not uniform as in the previous case; it depends on pixels inside the current processing window. So for the removal of salt and pepper noise at high noise densities with edge preservation (DBUTVF) decision based unsymmetrical trimmed variants filter is proposed [9].…”
Section: Un-symmetrical Trimmed Filtermentioning
confidence: 99%