2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.actamat.2013.10.071
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Untangling dislocation and grain boundary mediated plasticity in nanocrystalline nickel

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Overall, the diverse evolution of the respective deformation shares appears as being just a consequence of a complex hierarchical order of onset/nucleation and upholding stresses of different deformation mechanisms, the presence and degree of activity of which strongly depends on grain size. For example, in a recent study of NC Ni with a grain size of 30 nm, a strain share of about 40 % could be assigned to dislocation activity [31]. We finally conjecture that the state of the GB core structure, whether in relaxed (low-excess-energy) or as-prepared (high-excess-energy) configuration, should also have a decisive effect on the share and onset stresses of the above discussed deformation modes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 74%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Overall, the diverse evolution of the respective deformation shares appears as being just a consequence of a complex hierarchical order of onset/nucleation and upholding stresses of different deformation mechanisms, the presence and degree of activity of which strongly depends on grain size. For example, in a recent study of NC Ni with a grain size of 30 nm, a strain share of about 40 % could be assigned to dislocation activity [31]. We finally conjecture that the state of the GB core structure, whether in relaxed (low-excess-energy) or as-prepared (high-excess-energy) configuration, should also have a decisive effect on the share and onset stresses of the above discussed deformation modes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…To analyze the microstrain and grain size evolution, we make use of the single line method, introduced by de Keijser et al [39], which allows to extract separate values of grain size and microstrain for each {hkl}-reflection. The widely used Williamson-Hall approach led to poorly conditioned results, certainly due to the elastic anisotropy of PdAu but also related to the fact that the diffracted intensity has been recorded in transmission geometry, implying a slight variation of the orientation of the scattering vector with the diffraction angle which renders the Williamson-Hall approach intractable; further technical details can be found in [31]. Using the single line method, deconvolution of size and microstrain contributions results in the following equations for the volume averaged grain size D vol and the microstrain e…”
Section: Integral Peak Width: Microstrain and Grain Size Evolutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The texture consists of six-fold symmetries with maxima intensities for (111), (200), (311), and (222) reflections in the tensile direction and minima in intensity for the (220) reflection. The development of texture in this region is indicative of dislocation-mediated plasticity [11][12][13] and in this case is likely formed by rotation of the columnar grains into directions of preferred slip. [13][14][15] Cross-sectional FIB micrographs at the corresponding locations in Region I are shown in Figures 2(a2) and 2(b2).…”
mentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Deformation mechanisms operating in nanocrystalline metals sensitively depend on the average grain size and grain size distribution [1]. In contrast to coarse-grained polycrystalline metals, where plastic strain is predominantly carried by dislocations, grain-boundary-mediated deformation processes (including sliding and shuffling mechanisms) become increasingly relevant with decreasing grain size.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%