2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.sigpro.2022.108868
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Untangling first and second order statistics contributions in multipath scenarios

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This work investigates the DOA estimation performance degradation due to the presence of radar echo model misspecification, where the assumed model by the estimator does not consider the presence of multipath. Deriving estimators which consider the accurate multipath propagation model is impractical for the following reasons: 1) the multipath geometry is typically unknown in practical applications, 2) even if the model is perfectly known, the resulting DOA estimation algorithm would be significantly more computationally complex compared to the conventional approaches, since it is required to estimate the multipath parameters jointly, and 3) in some scenarios, more precise models which include additional parameters, may provide worse performance compared to misspecified models (see for example [51,57]).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This work investigates the DOA estimation performance degradation due to the presence of radar echo model misspecification, where the assumed model by the estimator does not consider the presence of multipath. Deriving estimators which consider the accurate multipath propagation model is impractical for the following reasons: 1) the multipath geometry is typically unknown in practical applications, 2) even if the model is perfectly known, the resulting DOA estimation algorithm would be significantly more computationally complex compared to the conventional approaches, since it is required to estimate the multipath parameters jointly, and 3) in some scenarios, more precise models which include additional parameters, may provide worse performance compared to misspecified models (see for example [51,57]).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[49,50]). The MCRB for range and Doppler estimation in ranging applications, such as globlal navigation satellite systems (GNSS) or single-input single-output (SISO) radar/sonar was introduced in [51].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The maximum number of iterations is set to 20 and the number of Monte Carlo is set to 1000 runs. In the results one can observe i) the √ CRB (refer to [11]), which represents the asymptotic estimation performance of the parameters without any source of interference, ii) the √ M CRB + Bias 2 which represents the asymptotic estimation performance of the parameters with an interference source (refer to [12], [18]) and describes the MSE of the misspecified maximum likelihood estimator [19], and iii) the Root MSE ( √ M SE) of the proposed EM algorithm. Note that the EM algorithm is not biased and it is able to correct the effects generated by the interference.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• the √ CRB (as referred to in [11]), which signifies the asymptotic estimation performance of the parameters in the absence of interference • the MCRB + Bias 2 , representing the asymptotic estimation performance of the parameters when the receiver is unaware of the presence of interference (as discussed in [13,27]). This includes the root MSE of the misspecified maximum likelihood esti- mator, as mentioned in [12].…”
Section: • Scenariomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To evaluate the performance of our proposed algorithm, we compare it against the theoretical limits of time-delay and Doppler shift estimation under the following particular cases: i) we consider the scenario where no interference corrupts the GNSS signal. Note that this is the best possible scenario and the theoretical limits are provided by the Cramér-Rao bound (CRB) derived in [11], ii) the misspecified conditional model [12,13]. In this scenario, the signal is corrupted by an interference but the receiver estimates the parameters of interest without considering it.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%