2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.tim.2010.11.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Untangling metabolic and communication networks: interactions of enterics with phytobacteria and their implications in produce safety

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

2
63
0
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
2
63
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition to microorganisms with symbiotic or parasitic plant-microbe interactions, the endosphere can be a reservoir for potentially human pathogenic bacteria such as human enteric pathogens (7,12). Recent outbreaks highlight important deficiencies in our understanding of the ecology of enteric pathogens outside of their human and animal hosts (43).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to microorganisms with symbiotic or parasitic plant-microbe interactions, the endosphere can be a reservoir for potentially human pathogenic bacteria such as human enteric pathogens (7,12). Recent outbreaks highlight important deficiencies in our understanding of the ecology of enteric pathogens outside of their human and animal hosts (43).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, very little is known about the overall diversity and composition of microbial communities on harvested produce and how these communities vary across produce types. Based on recent studies on this topic (Rudi et al, 2002;Ponce et al, 2008;Ottesen et al, 2009;Rastogi et al, 2012;Leff and Fierer, 2013;), a few key patterns are emerging: (1) different produce types and cultivars can harbor different levels (abundances) of specific microbial groups (Critzer and Doyle, 2010), (2) farming and storage conditions can influence the composition and abundances of microbial communities found on produce, and (3) non-pathogenic microbes can interact with and inhibit microbial pathogens found on produce surfaces (Shi et al, 2009;Critzer and Doyle, 2010;Teplitski et al, 2011). Despite this recent body of work, we still have a limited understanding of the diversity of produce-associated microbial communities, their function, the factors that influence the composition of these communities after harvest and during storage, and the distribution of individual taxa (particularly those taxa that are difficult to culture) across different commodities.…”
Section: The Role Of the Microbiome In Fruit Health And Disease à A Nmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pathogenic bacteria (e.g., Listeria monocytogenes, Escherichia coli, Salmonella) can also be part of larger microbial communities on fresh produce (Shi et al, 2009;Teplitski et al, 2011). Field surveys on contamination of produce with pathogenic bacteria such as E. coli O157:H7, Salmonella spp., and L. monocytogenes found drastically different results depending on the methods, location, seasons, produce type, and criteria of the survey conducted.…”
Section: Prevalence and Diversity Of Microbial Communities On Fresh Vmentioning
confidence: 99%