2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2022.119034
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Untangling the contribution of input parameters to an artificial intelligence PM2.5 forecast model using the layer-wise relevance propagation method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is confirmed that the forecasting of the RNN model chiefly depends on the input information. The MAE of the RNN model for PM 2.5 prediction is 8.4 [ 59 ]. The optimized LSTM model has good assessment criteria, with R 2 = 0.94, RMSE = 13.06 μg/m 3 , and MAE = 8.61 μg/m 3 [ 60 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is confirmed that the forecasting of the RNN model chiefly depends on the input information. The MAE of the RNN model for PM 2.5 prediction is 8.4 [ 59 ]. The optimized LSTM model has good assessment criteria, with R 2 = 0.94, RMSE = 13.06 μg/m 3 , and MAE = 8.61 μg/m 3 [ 60 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further, this LRP extension to recurrent networks was successfully applied in the health domain for therapy prediction 60 and in computer security for discovering vulnerability in source code 61 . A recent work also applied the technique to a recurrent network for forecasting, where it helped identifying a subset of input variables that lead to a similar prediction performance when the model was re-trained only on this subset 62 .…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the buildup of air pollutants brought into Indonesia from continental sources to the west of Indonesia, record-breaking PM2.5 concentrations (peak >150 µgram/m 3 ) were detected in Tangerang in July-October 2022. For high PM2.5 events (PM2.5 36 µgram/m 3 ) in 2021, NIER's one-day prediction accuracy was only 56% [3], [4], [5].…”
Section: Levels In Recognition Of the Severely Harmful Impactsmentioning
confidence: 99%