2021
DOI: 10.1111/oik.07989
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Untangling the mechanisms of cryptic species coexistence in a nematode community through individual‐based modelling

Abstract: Cryptic species are morphologically identical but genetically distinct, and are prominent across numerous phyla. The coexistence of such closely related species on local scales would seem to run counter to traditional coexistence and competition theory; it has been hypothesized as a consequence of differences in their resource use or tolerances to environmental conditions. We developed an individual-based model of a community of three cryptic Litoditis marina (nematode) species, to understand how individual-le… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, the trophic functional diversity mirrored the taxonomic diversity due to the large trophic spectrum and the high adaptive plasticity of nematode buccal cavity morphologies that are closely associated with the high biodiversity of the phylum ( De Meester et al, 2016 ; Daly et al, 2021 ). Thus, a reduction in the functional diversity could, in the future, be considered an indirect measure of biodiversity loss.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Furthermore, the trophic functional diversity mirrored the taxonomic diversity due to the large trophic spectrum and the high adaptive plasticity of nematode buccal cavity morphologies that are closely associated with the high biodiversity of the phylum ( De Meester et al, 2016 ; Daly et al, 2021 ). Thus, a reduction in the functional diversity could, in the future, be considered an indirect measure of biodiversity loss.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…For instance, cryptic butterfly taxa show lower co‐occurrence than the congeneric non‐cryptic species (Vodă et al, 2015); cryptic congeners of fig wasps demonstrate strong evidence of competitive exclusion, whilst morphologically distinct congeners often co‐occur together (Darwell & Cook, 2017). However, there are examples of cryptic species coexistence through niche partitioning (Daly et al, 2021; Leibold, 1998; Scriven et al, 2016; Wellborn & Cothran, 2007). Occasional nesting in the same trap‐nests and in the cavities of approximately the same diameter, similar reproductive behaviour and overlapping prey and natural enemy composition imply the niche similarity of A. balticus sp.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their coexistence primarily arises from niche partitioning, driven by subtle differences in resource use or environmental preferences ( De Meester et al, 2011 ; De Meester et al, 2015a ; Derycke et al, 2016 ; Guden et al, 2018 ; Guden, Derycke & Moens, 2021 ). Neutral dynamics ( Hubbell, 2005 ) or fluctuating environmental conditions also contribute to coexistence, as do temporal fluctuations in biotic and environmental factors ( Daly et al, 2021 ; De Meester et al, 2011 ; De Meester et al, 2015b ). Occasional episodic occurrence of specific environmental conditions can temporarily favor competitively inferior species, and facilitate coexistence with stronger competitors ( Guden et al, 2018 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%