Untargeted soil metabolomics methods for analysis of extractable organic matter

Abstract

a b s t r a c tThe cycling of soil organic matter (SOM) by microorganisms is a critical component of the global carbon cycle but remains poorly understood. There is an emerging view that much of SOM, and especially the dissolved fraction (DOM), is composed of small molecules of plant and microbial origin resulting from lysed cells and released metabolites. Unfortunately, little is known about the small molecule composition of soils and how these molecules are cycled (by microbes or plants or by adsorption to mineral surfaces). The water-extractable organic matter (WEOM) fraction is of particular interest given that this is presumably the most biologically-accessible component of SOM. Here we describe the development of a simple soil metabolomics workflow and a novel spike recovery approach using 13 C bacterial lysates to assess the types of metabolites remaining in the WEOM fraction. Soil samples were extracted with multiple mass spectrometry-compatible extraction buffers (water, 10 mM K 2 SO 4 or NH 4 HCO 3 , 10e100% methanol or isopropanol/methanol/water [3:3:2 v/v/v]) with and without prior chloroform vapor fumigation. Profiling of derivatized extracts was performed using gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (GC/MS) with 55 metabolites identified by comparing fragmentation patterns and retention times with authentic standards. As expected, fumigation, which is thought to lyse microbial cells, significantly increased the range and abundance of metabolites relative to unfumigated samples. To assess the types of microbial metabolites from lysed bacterial cells that remain in the WEOM fraction, an extract was prepared from the soil bacterium Pseudomonas stutzerii RCH2 grown on 13 C acetate. This approach produced highly labeled metabolites that were easily discriminated from the endogenous soil metabolites. Comparing the composition of the fresh bacterial extract with what was recovered following a 15 min incubation with soil revealed that only 27% of the metabolites showed >50% recovery in the WEOM. Many, especially cations (polyamines) and anions, showed <10% recovery. These represent metabolites that may be inaccessible to microbes in this environment and would be most likely to accumulate as SOM presumably due to binding with minerals and negatively-charged clay particles. This study presents a simple untargeted metabolomics workflow for extractable organic matter and an approach to estimate microbial metabolite availability in soils. These methods can be used to further our understanding of SOM and DOM composition and examine the link between metabolic pathways and microbial communities to terrestrial carbon cycling.Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Proteogenomic analyses indicate bacterial methylotrophy and archaeal heterotrophy are prevalent below the grass root zone

“…We investigated the distribution of metabolites in triplicate extracted soil water samples using a robust Liquid Chromatography-based Mass Spectroscopy (LC-MS) metabolomics workflow based on a previous study on samples from the meadow soils (Swenson et al, 2015). A total of 125 unique compounds were detected and quantified.…”

“…Metabolites were extracted from sieved (2 mm) soil samples using an aqueous extraction protocol (modified from Swenson et al, 2015). Briefly, sieved soils (4 g) were incubated (200 rpm, 1 h, 4°C) in triplicate with MilliQ water (16 ml) amended with 1.6 µg/ml of ABMBA (2-Amino-3-Bromo-5-methylbenzoic acid) and 2 µg/ml of UL-13C-Glucose included as internal extraction standards.…”

Metabolite profiling of non‐sterile rhizosphere soil

“…organic and amino acids, coumarins) that do not address the biochemical diversity of rhizosphere soil. Recent advances in liquid chromatography, mass spectrometry, and uni-and multivariate data analysis have made it possible to conduct untargeted metabolic profiling of complex metabolite mixtures, such as root exudates and soil extracts (Khorassani et al, 2011;Strehmel et al, 2014;Swenson et al, 2015;Ziegler et al, 2015;van Dam and Bouwmeester, 2016). In this study, we employed untargeted UPLC-Q-TOF analysis of soil extracts, followed by uni-and multivariate data reduction to separate rhizosphere-specific chemistry from common soil chemistry.…”

Multilab EcoFAB study shows highly reproducible physiology and depletion of soil metabolites by a model grass

“…Specialized imaging techniques, such as magnetic resonance imaging, computed tomography (Metzner et al ., ; Helliwell et al ., ), or the use of labeled plants (Rellán‐Álvarez et al ., ), have been developed, but they are not widely accessible or amenable to high‐throughput experimentation (Metzner et al ., ). Similarly, approaches for the investigation of root exudation in soils include the use of in situ soil drainage systems (lysimeters) in fields (Strobel, ), which are low throughput and require complex installations, or of laboratory‐based extraction methods that are based on flushing the soil with large volumes of liquids (Swenson et al ., ; Pétriacq et al ., ). Studying metabolites within rhizosphere soils is also challenging because of the complex mixture of plant‐ and microbe‐derived metabolites, which are potentially altered by the chemistry and mineralogy of the soil investigated.…”