2019
DOI: 10.1055/a-0759-5135
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Unterscheiden sich Kinder mit und ohne pragmatisch-kommunikative Defizite in ihrer Mediennutzung?

Abstract: Zusammenfassung Hintergrund Die Studie befasst sich mit dem Konsum sprachförderlicher Medien (Hörbuch, Buch, Musik) von Kindern mit und ohne Defizite in den pragmatisch-kommunikativen Fähigkeiten. Methode Es nahmen 104 Kinder im Alter von 48 – 71 Monaten (M = 59,80; SD = 6,71) teil. Anhand einer multivariaten Varianzanalyse wird die Elterneinschätzungen zum Medienkonsum von n = 43 auffälligen (Risikogruppe, RG) und n = 61 unauffälligen (Vergleichsgruppe, VG) Kindern verglichen. Für die Grup… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 15 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Studies show that children growing up multilingually consume more image-focused visual media (like cartoons or movies) than children growing up monolingually but avoid language-focused media like audio plays/dramas [34]. Irrespective of the children's FL, it is evident that children with deficits in pragmatic-communicative skills (as an aspect of language competence, e.g., appropriate and rules-based use of language in social context) are less likely to use language-enhancing media [35].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies show that children growing up multilingually consume more image-focused visual media (like cartoons or movies) than children growing up monolingually but avoid language-focused media like audio plays/dramas [34]. Irrespective of the children's FL, it is evident that children with deficits in pragmatic-communicative skills (as an aspect of language competence, e.g., appropriate and rules-based use of language in social context) are less likely to use language-enhancing media [35].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%