2019
DOI: 10.1002/stab.201900058
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Untersuchungen zu Verbundträgern mit randnahen Verbunddübelleisten

Abstract: Im Stahlverbundbau bieten Verbunddübelleisten eine wirtschaftliche Alternative zu klassischen Verbundmitteln wie Kopfbolzendübeln. Moderne Verbundkonstruktionen werden insbesondere im Hochbau zunehmend filigraner hergestellt. Um die hierfür erforderlichen geringen Deckendicken zu realisieren, können Verbunddübelleisten horizontal innerhalb der Betonplatte angeordnet werden, woraus ein geringer seitlicher Abstand zum freien Betonplattenrand resultiert. Bisherige Untersuchungen beschreiben unterschiedliche Versa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This observation is caused by two overlapping effects. Firstly, it is due to the pulverization of the concrete in the quasi-hydrostatic compressive stress zone directly below the steel teeth, which is also reflected in the predominant concrete deformation in the slip composition of the 100 mm thick specimens (figure 5d) and was described more detailed in [18,19]. Secondly, the 4 mm thick steel teeth reached their yield strength at the said load level, resulting in the large total slip of the 200 mm thick specimens, their load-bearing capacity was ultimately limited by the steel resistance and not by edge failure.…”
Section: Small-size Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This observation is caused by two overlapping effects. Firstly, it is due to the pulverization of the concrete in the quasi-hydrostatic compressive stress zone directly below the steel teeth, which is also reflected in the predominant concrete deformation in the slip composition of the 100 mm thick specimens (figure 5d) and was described more detailed in [18,19]. Secondly, the 4 mm thick steel teeth reached their yield strength at the said load level, resulting in the large total slip of the 200 mm thick specimens, their load-bearing capacity was ultimately limited by the steel resistance and not by edge failure.…”
Section: Small-size Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This article summarizes the test program of the small-size specimens within the research project as well as the resulting design model including the underlying engineering models. A more detailed description of individual topics has already been given in [18][19][20]. Furthermore, large-size component tests were carried out to verify the transferability of the design equations which are presented within the final report [21].…”
Section: Introduction and State Of The Artmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…γv partial factor for shear resistance according to [18]: In order to validate the transferability of the resistance formula, which has been derived on the basis of small-sized push-out tests and simulations, three 6-meter-long composite beams were tested with different cross sections covering various types of positioning of the composite dowels close to the concrete surface (Figure 13). The results are presented more detailed within [26]. Figure 16 summarizes the load-deflection behavior of the composite beam tests.…”
Section: Figure 12 Comparison Between Experimental and Theoretical Re...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, an integration into the European standardization process via a so-called Technical Specification (CEN TS) is currently being sought in order to enable the use of composite dowels in building and bridge construction in the long term. In addition to the existing design concept of longitudinal shear resistance, approaches for the resistance of composite dowels in cracked concrete [3], [4], under tensile or mixed shear-tensile loads [5], [6] as well as under edge influences [7], [8] are currently being developed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%