2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jce.2014.12.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Untouchability, homicides and water access

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
20
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
2
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite the constitutional ban, in 2012, 30% of the rural respondents to the Indian Human Development Survey straightforwardly reported that they practiced untouchability. This practice translates in a variety of ways, including the exclusion of SCs from markets, or systematic deviation from market prices to their disadvantage (Thorat, Mahamanlik and Sadana's survey results in S. Thorat & Newman, 2010), constraints on access to credit (Kumar, 2013), spatial segregation (Deliège, 2004), widespread exclusion from public goods (Hanna & Linden, 2012;Shah, Mander, Thorat, Deshpande, & Baviskar, 2006), and a specific pattern of crimes against them (a pattern consistent with the enforcement of caste-based discrimination, Bros & Couttenier, 2015;Sharma, 2015).…”
Section: Castesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the constitutional ban, in 2012, 30% of the rural respondents to the Indian Human Development Survey straightforwardly reported that they practiced untouchability. This practice translates in a variety of ways, including the exclusion of SCs from markets, or systematic deviation from market prices to their disadvantage (Thorat, Mahamanlik and Sadana's survey results in S. Thorat & Newman, 2010), constraints on access to credit (Kumar, 2013), spatial segregation (Deliège, 2004), widespread exclusion from public goods (Hanna & Linden, 2012;Shah, Mander, Thorat, Deshpande, & Baviskar, 2006), and a specific pattern of crimes against them (a pattern consistent with the enforcement of caste-based discrimination, Bros & Couttenier, 2015;Sharma, 2015).…”
Section: Castesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These data are not designed for cross‐country comparisons and might therefore not be fully reliable. See also Bros and Couttenier () for related work.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Water governance has been problematized for over two decades now through critiques of the widespread privatization and commoditization of water that have followed urbanization, globalization, and the growing neoliberal imagination [6,39,40]. Other work has probed water governance using analytical departure points as diverse as context-specific property rights and water rights systems [32,41], attempts at territorial consolidation [42], the violent building of dams to support urbanization [43], the role of caste on the ability to access water [44], and even the relationship between social norms around caste-related access to water to homicides [45]. Notwithstanding the diversity in their points of departure, these studies have powerfully emphasized the need for water governance to be understood through lenses of power relations, social justice, and rights [28,46].…”
Section: Water Governance and Accessmentioning
confidence: 99%