2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.sab.2010.01.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Unusual calibration curves observed for iron using high-resolution continuum source graphite furnace atomic absorption spectrometry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Fortunately, use of high-resolution continuum source AAS provides an advantage in this regard, as it is possible to expand the linear range simply by selecting the appropriate detector pixels on the wings of the absorption line prole. 27,28,40,41 Indeed, as higher analyte amounts are introduced into the atomizer, at some mass the signal at the center of the absorption line will grow more slowly, losing the linear response and eventually become saturated or even self-absorbed. However, as the analyte mass increases, the absorption line prole also becomes broader, such that use of side pixels becomes advantageous by permitting an increase in the working range.…”
Section: Wavelength Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fortunately, use of high-resolution continuum source AAS provides an advantage in this regard, as it is possible to expand the linear range simply by selecting the appropriate detector pixels on the wings of the absorption line prole. 27,28,40,41 Indeed, as higher analyte amounts are introduced into the atomizer, at some mass the signal at the center of the absorption line will grow more slowly, losing the linear response and eventually become saturated or even self-absorbed. However, as the analyte mass increases, the absorption line prole also becomes broader, such that use of side pixels becomes advantageous by permitting an increase in the working range.…”
Section: Wavelength Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This aspect is remarkable because, although attaining such a wide working range for a narrow atomic line, such as the one used for Ag, with ame atomization has been reported, 46 much more moderate gains are typically observed for other elements 49 particularly when using GFAAS, 27 and sometimes anomalous behaviors (two different linear regions) have been described in the literature. 50 It is therefore not clear yet what level of enhancement can be considered as typical when using side pixel registration, and more results on this topic would be welcome.…”
Section: Paper Analytical Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…seem to show linearity in other ranges, 33 from 120 or 200 to 400 ng and probably more, but notice that such linearities (e.g., from 200 to 400 for pixels 131, 114 and 100) do not necessarily go through the intercept. That means that this second range of linearity could be used for external calibration, 35 but not for MEC or MER as the equations shown in sections 3.1.1 and 3.1.2 will not be valid.…”
Section: Monitoring Cabr Around 625 Nm: Different Intensity Transitionsmentioning
confidence: 99%