2003
DOI: 10.1002/anie.200390346
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Unusual Complex Chemistry of Rare‐Earth Elements: Large Ionic Radii—Small Coordination Numbers

Abstract: Because of their large ionic radii and relatively low oxidation states rare-earth elements generally form complexes which have high coordination numbers and weak metal-ligand bonds. They are often not suitable for homogeneous catalysis on account of their instability of configuration in solution. Complexes of the corresponding metal atoms with low coordination numbers may be an improvement. This type of complex can be obtained in the classical way by the introduction of bulky ligands, and recently, they were a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
55
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 102 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 127 publications
2
55
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It can be seen that light rare earth compounds produce PDLLA with higher yields and molecular weights. The reason of the activity difference between various rare earth catalysts may result from the nature of the rare earth metal and the ancillary ligands present in the coordination sphere of the metal [25][26][27][28][29] .…”
Section: Infl Uence Of Substitution Of the Aryloxide Ligands On The Pmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It can be seen that light rare earth compounds produce PDLLA with higher yields and molecular weights. The reason of the activity difference between various rare earth catalysts may result from the nature of the rare earth metal and the ancillary ligands present in the coordination sphere of the metal [25][26][27][28][29] .…”
Section: Infl Uence Of Substitution Of the Aryloxide Ligands On The Pmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[4,50] In contrast, rare-earth element Lewis acids (such as CeCl 3 ) tend, in several circumstances, to be incapable of chelation because the resulting large coordination number leads to long and therefore unstable metalligand bonds. [51] Chelation and nonchelation control have been proposed by us to justify the diastereofacial selectivity obtained in the reduction of α-alkyl-β-functionalised carbonyl compounds. On the basis of this, we have studied the reduction of N-protected α-alkyl-β-amino ketones 18 leading to the formation of syn-and anti-1-amino-3-hydroxy compounds (syn-19 and anti-19; Table 4).…”
Section: Diastereoselective Reduction Of N-protected α-Alkyl-β-amino mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[12] A chelation and non-chelation control model has been proposed by us to justify the diastereofacial selectivity obtained in reductions of α-substituted β-functionalized carbonyl compounds. On the basis of these results, we have examined the reduction of N-protected α-substituted β-amino ketones (1) in the expectation of the formation of syn-and anti-1-amino-3-hydroxy compounds 2.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%