2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2021.05.040
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Unusual morphology in the mid-Cretaceous lizard Oculudentavis

Abstract: Unusual morphology in the mid-Cretaceous lizard OculudentavisHighlights d A new species of the reptile in amber, Oculudentavis, is described d Oculudentavis is a bizarre lizard, not a bird d The bird-like appearance of Oculudentavis is due to convergence in skull proportions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 467 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This species and Oculudentavis khaungraae Xing et al, 2020 were classified within Squamata 39 , one of the biggest orders containing lizards, snakes and amphisbaenians or worm lizards. Bolet et al 39 focused on the description of the new taxon, but not on the diverse data that the abundant syninclusions of the piece can provide. One interesting bioinclusion is a large beetle probably of the superfamily Elateroidea.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This species and Oculudentavis khaungraae Xing et al, 2020 were classified within Squamata 39 , one of the biggest orders containing lizards, snakes and amphisbaenians or worm lizards. Bolet et al 39 focused on the description of the new taxon, but not on the diverse data that the abundant syninclusions of the piece can provide. One interesting bioinclusion is a large beetle probably of the superfamily Elateroidea.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We should also consider the distortion of fossil specimens in reconstructing the sizes of soft structures based on preserved scleral ossicle rings. Various methods have been proposed to retrodeform two‐dimensional or three‐dimensional preserved fossil specimens by using a set of liner or angular measurements (Motani, 1997), landmarks (Bolet et al, 2021; Molnar et al, 2012; Tallman et al, 2014), and geometric morphometrics (Angielczyk & Sheets, 2007; Hedrick & Dodson, 2013). Ideally, such retrodeformation should be performed on fossil specimens before applying the correlations between the skeletal and soft tissue structures found in extant squamates.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Global deformation was quantified as the distance between corresponding landmarks (i.e., vertices), similarly to previous studies (e.g., Di Vincenzo et al, 2017;Schlager et al, 2018;Cirilli et al, 2020;Bolet et al, 2021). However, shape variation between the original specimen and the reconstruction was visualised as heat maps using vertex colours in MAYA through a custom MAYA Embedded Language (MEL) script (Supplementary Material).…”
Section: Quantification Of Deformationmentioning
confidence: 99%