2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijscr.2023.108477
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Unusual presentation of uterine tumors resembling ovarian sex cord tumor: A rare case report of cervical involvement

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As regards age, this neoplasm often occurs in perimenopausal or menopausal women [19]. However, in a more recent and large series reported by Boyraz et al, the patients' age ranged from 21-84 (mean: 52.4; median: 53) years [20], moreover in the literature many cases have been reported in which the patients can be <40 years [16,[21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32] or are very young [33,34].…”
Section: Clinical Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As regards age, this neoplasm often occurs in perimenopausal or menopausal women [19]. However, in a more recent and large series reported by Boyraz et al, the patients' age ranged from 21-84 (mean: 52.4; median: 53) years [20], moreover in the literature many cases have been reported in which the patients can be <40 years [16,[21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32] or are very young [33,34].…”
Section: Clinical Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More rarely, a UTROSCT can be observed in the cervix. In fact, in the literature we found only four cases [21,33,37,67] that presented as cervical masses, mimicking a primary cervical carcinoma on instrumental tests, such as Computed Tomography (CT) or pelvic Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), on macroscopic, histologic and cytologic examination. So, as emphasized by Dubruc et al, it is important to keep in mind that UTROSCTs can also be encountered in current cervical screening programs, and in this occurrence, can be responsible for diagnostic pitfalls [67].…”
Section: Macroscopic Findingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in a more recent and large series reported by Boyraz et al, the patients’ age ranged from 21 to 84 years (mean: 52.4; median: 53) [ 20 ]. Moreover, in the literature, many cases have been reported in which the patients were aged < 40 years [ 16 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 ] or even very young women [ 33 , 34 ]. The most common symptom found is abnormal vaginal bleeding (67.1%) [ 35 ].…”
Section: Clinical Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More rarely, a UTROSCT has been observed in the cervix. In fact, in the literature, we found only four cases [ 21 , 33 , 37 , 64 ] that presented as cervical masses, mimicking a primary cervical carcinoma on instrumental tests such as computed tomography (CT) or pelvic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), as well as on macroscopic, histological, and cytological examination. Thus, as emphasized by Dubruc et al, it is important to keep in mind that UTROSCTs can also be encountered in current cervical screening programs, in which case they can be responsible for diagnostic pitfalls [ 64 ].…”
Section: Pathological Featuresmentioning
confidence: 99%