2004
DOI: 10.1146/annurev.matsci.34.040203.114607
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Unusual Properties and Structure of Carbon Nanotubes

Abstract: ▪ Abstract  The unusual structure and properties of carbon nanotubes are presented, with particular reference to single-wall nanotubes (SWNTs) and nanotube properties that differ from those of their bulk counterparts. The atomic structure; electronic structure; and vibrational, optical, mechanical, and thermal properties are discussed, with reference made to nanotube junctions, nanotube filling, and double-wall nanotubes (DWNTs). Special attention is given to resonance Raman spectroscopy at the single nanotube… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
298
2
12

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 474 publications
(317 citation statements)
references
References 118 publications
5
298
2
12
Order By: Relevance
“…The spectra consist of four well-known and characteristic CNT bands: [35][36][37] 1578 cm -1 (G band, attributed to in-plane C-C symmetric stretching vibrations in graphene sheets), 1335 cm -1 (D band, usually attributed to the presence of disordered carbon, as well as to the structural disorder, such as defective rings, presence of heteroatoms, dangling bond and vacancies, present in the graphene sheet), 2655 cm -1 (G' or 2D band, a second order band that is an overtone of the D band) and a weak shoulder at higher frequencies of the G-band at 1612 cm 13). According to the XRD and TG data previously discussed, these two treatments are more efficient at the removal of amorphous carbon.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The spectra consist of four well-known and characteristic CNT bands: [35][36][37] 1578 cm -1 (G band, attributed to in-plane C-C symmetric stretching vibrations in graphene sheets), 1335 cm -1 (D band, usually attributed to the presence of disordered carbon, as well as to the structural disorder, such as defective rings, presence of heteroatoms, dangling bond and vacancies, present in the graphene sheet), 2655 cm -1 (G' or 2D band, a second order band that is an overtone of the D band) and a weak shoulder at higher frequencies of the G-band at 1612 cm 13). According to the XRD and TG data previously discussed, these two treatments are more efficient at the removal of amorphous carbon.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mass ratio is defined as m 2 /m 1 and values of 0.1, 0.2, 0.25, 0.3, 0.4, 0.5, 0.6, 0.7, 0.8, 0.9, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5,6,7,8,9, and 10 are considered. To isolate the effects of the phonon dispersion and mass density on thermal conductivity, we use classical (i.e., Boltzmann) statistics at a temperature of 500 K. Doing so compared to quantum statistics removes the frequency dependence of the specific heat from the thermal conductivity prediction.…”
Section: Methodology a Lattice Dynamics Calculationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3][4][5][6][7] For application in thermoelectric energy conversion, many previous studies have focused on how to reduce thermal conductivity. [8][9][10] Phonon scattering increases with increasing anharmonicity and defect concentration, resulting in lower thermal conductivity. In single species (i.e., monatomic) materials, larger atomic mass reduces the phonon group velocities and, thus, thermal conductivity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The bands calculated in the third neighbor ETB model are shown as solid blue lines and the results of the nearest neighbor simple tight-binding model described in [34] are shown as red dash-dotted lines. In a SWNT with chiral indices (n, m), a translational vector T can be found parallel to the tube axis [34,75]. The translational vector is T = t 1 a 1 + t 2 a 2 ≡ (t 1 , t 2 ) where t 1 = (2m + n)/ gcd(2n + m, 2m + n) and t 2 = −(2n + m)/ gcd(2n + m, 2m+n) with gcd(i, j) being the greatest common divisor of two positive integers i and j.…”
Section: Electronic Statesmentioning
confidence: 99%