Unveiling Fundamental Relationships in Industrial Product Development

Gustafsson, Göran; Raudberget, Dag; Ström, Mikael

doi:10.1016/j.procir.2016.05.092

Cited by 4 publications

(7 citation statements)

References 4 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Relationships between entities can be visualised in extended causal diagrams to increase the understanding of mutual dependencies of product criteria (Gustafsson et al, 2016). The impact of one entity on another is shown by an arrow and a plus or a minus sign to indicate how a change in the first entity numerically influences the other.…”

Section: Causality and Trade-offsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

New combination of methods for supporting a simplified set-based design approach

Ström,

Gustafsson,

Hans

2024

Proc. Des. Soc.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This work presents a Set-Based Design inspired approach for generation, evaluation and reduction of a solution space of alternative product concepts. Also, the aspect of how to implement the process in an industrial environment was investigated. The hypothesis, confirmed by case studies, is that it can be done using existing methods like Enhanced functional modelling, brainwriting, the Gallery method, Axiomatic Design, causal diagrams and Pugh matrices. The method can be successfully introduced in a timeframe of a few working days and support development engineers in the concept design phase.

show abstract

Section: Causality and Trade-offsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…This type of information is easy to understand. The tool can be quickly introduced in an industrial context, and then used without need for external support (Gustafsson et al, 2016).…”

Section: Causality and Trade-offsmentioning

confidence: 99%

New combination of methods for supporting a simplified set-based design approach

Ström,

Gustafsson,

Hans

2024

Proc. Des. Soc.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The ndings demonstrate that the most signi cant factor in uencing project outcomes is project complexity and that certain characteristics of teams and organizations can assist in mitigating the negative effects of high complexity. [30] To enhance the e ciency of rotor blade carriers' design and assembly, this paper suggests a modularization strategy. Simon kazmarec, sibastean hogreav suggest dividing the carriers into smaller, modular parts that can be designed and optimized on their own.…”

Section: Geometrical Optimizationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Design optimization of FPSO Topside Module for InPlace, Lift and Weighing conditions

Yadhav

Kulkarni

2023

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Traditional structural design work involves repeated modeling, which is a tedious and time-consuming activity. To solve such problems, optimization of structural elements by using the UC ratio along with grouping is proposed. In the design of the offshore floating platform, optimization methods find out minimum weight solutions for the structure. However, due to the high diversity of profiles cost raises a lot. By doing the optimization in a grouping by UC ratio technique provides the unique optimal solution. The current study proposes an approach for reliability-based optimal design of FPSO structure. The current study comments on the optimized design of Topside FPSO structural assembly for various load conditions like Production tank pressure loads, Equipment loads, Piping loads, Electrical and Instrumentation load, girder deformation loads, Wind load, etc. Both Normal Operating and Extreme Operating conditions are taken by considering the effects of hull flexibility along with wind and motion-induced accelerations. The analysis and design optimization are performed in the STAAD Pro tool by selecting the least weight as an objective function while obeying the design constraints as per API standards. Optimization performed based upon Utility Check ratio in STAAD Pro tool. With analysis models constructed as described above, module primary structure design can be iteratively “unity-check-optimized”. By implication given method, optimized member unity checks (UCs) translate into optimized weight and hence cost optimization.

show abstract

“…For the realisation of a SE, it is primarily of interest to know to what extent systems depend on each other, and the extent to which they influence each other. To make the development of a SE a process with less unpredictable outcomes and less random events, all critical knowledge gaps must be located and closed at the earliest possible moment (Gustafsson, Raudberget, & Ström, 2016). If the components reinforce each other, in fact a combined system can also be more than one combination of separate systems, real synergy can be achieved.…”

Section: Dependencies Of and Causal Relations Between Elementsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…(Gustafsson, Raudberget, & Ström, 2016) describes an example of a causal diagram that shows four kinds of information (figure 3.2):…”

Section: Dependencies Of and Causal Relations Between Elementsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Enhancing the effectiveness of design tools in synthetic environments

Damgrave¹

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Unveiling Fundamental Relationships in Industrial Product Development

Cited by 4 publications

References 4 publications

New combination of methods for supporting a simplified set-based design approach

New combination of methods for supporting a simplified set-based design approach

Design optimization of FPSO Topside Module for InPlace, Lift and Weighing conditions

Enhancing the effectiveness of design tools in synthetic environments

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About