hole mobilities within the HTL of up to 1.6 × 10 -3 cm 2 V -1 s -1 . [4] However, the use of such highly hygroscopic lithium salts has been shown to dramatically accelerate the degradation of PSCs. [5][6][7][8] Previous works have identified that upon doping with LiTFSI, lithium ions can readily become mobile and diffuse within the perovskite layer, forming hygroscopic LiX salts (where Xis a halide) which in turn rapidly degrade the perovskite. [5,[9][10][11][12][13][14] Wang et al demonstrated that following evaporation of tert-butylpyridine (tBP), a common spiro-OMeTAD additive, LiTFSI begins to form hygroscopic aggregates which hydrate the perovskite/spiro-OMeTAD interface degrading the perovskite over a period of < 1000 hours. [8] Furthermore, it has also been shown that tBP is, by itself, insufficient to prevent the migration of lithium ions. [7] To this extent, Kim et al. recently revealed that the migration of Li + is critical in the degradation of spiro-OMeTAD-based devices and is accelerated at higher temperatures, leading to the rapid degradation of the perovskite. [7] For these combined reasons spiro-OMeTAD-based PSCs consistently fall short of the practical requirements for the commercialization of solar cells. Indeed, the poor stability of LiTFSI doped spiro-OMeTAD as an HTL has become such a problem that many leading studies using the architecture replace the HTL with a more stable, yet lower efficiency, alternative or emit reporting stability entirely. [6,15] Consequently, addressing the impact of lithium on device stability is one of the biggest challenges facing the highest efficiency PSCs.As of writing, two principal strategies have emerged within the literature for improving the stability of n-i-p PSCs, namely (i) searching for new less destructive dopants or (ii) replacing spiro-OMeTAD in favor of alternative stable HTLs such as poly(triarylamine) (PTAA), poly(3-hexathiophene) (P3HT) or a range of novel molecular transporting materials (Table S1, Supporting Information). [5,[16][17][18] While these candidates can yield improvements in the long-term stability, the PCEs of resultant devices remain inferior to the spiro-OMeTAD counterparts. This performance gap has led to a trade-off between efficiency and stability in PSCs. More recently the formation of a blocking layer between the lithium doped spiro-OMeTAD HTL and the perovskite has been suggested using either graphene or flower-like MoS 2 . [11,19] Similar to the previous approaches, devices prepared using a blocking layer have yet to match the high efficiencies achieved using the conventional spiro-OMeTAD architecture, reaching up to 20.18% in devices prepared with MoS 2 . Furthermore, by blocking the Li + at the interface, the mechanism by which hygroscopic agregates are formed is not avoided. This challenge, therefore, requires new strategies that target the Li + ions within the HTL itself, preventing the accumulation of Li + at the interface and subsequent degradation. Very recently, several studies have sought to replace the Li + metal ...