2023
DOI: 10.18415/ijmmu.v10i6.4683
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Unveiling the Narrative Strategies of World Religious Literature: An In-Depth Exploration

Abstract: This article examines the narrative strategies used in world religious literature, exploring how these texts create and convey meaning and how they shape religious beliefs and practices across different cultures and time periods. The article provides a theoretical framework for understanding narrative strategy in religious literature, exploring the role of historical and cultural contexts, characters, plot and structure, symbolism and metaphor, point of view and perspective, and intertextuality. By examining a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 34 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Symbolism and metaphor detection can be assisted by AI technologies in the detection and interpretation of symbolism and metaphorical expressions found in religious scriptures (Geraci 2008). Religious literature often uses symbolism and metaphors to convey deeper meanings and spiritual truths (Susanto et al 2023). AI algorithms can identify metaphorical language and symbolic references within the texts by utilizing natural language processing techniques (Kang et al 2020).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Symbolism and metaphor detection can be assisted by AI technologies in the detection and interpretation of symbolism and metaphorical expressions found in religious scriptures (Geraci 2008). Religious literature often uses symbolism and metaphors to convey deeper meanings and spiritual truths (Susanto et al 2023). AI algorithms can identify metaphorical language and symbolic references within the texts by utilizing natural language processing techniques (Kang et al 2020).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%