2006
DOI: 10.1080/00343400600632663
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Unwilling or unable? spatial and socio-economic restrictions on females’ labour market access

Abstract: Abstract:We analyse the effects of regional structures on both females' willingness to work and the probability of being employed for those willing to work. Special permission was granted to link regional data to individual respondents in the German Socio-Economic Panel (GSOEP). Results of a bivariate probit model correcting for sample selection show that high regional unemployment discourages women from entering the labor market. Those who are willing to work find it easier to do so if living in regions with … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
25
0
3

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
25
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…This spatial concentration of more traditional values might obscure effects from the residential context that have our primary interest. Religiosity is commonly used in models of female labour force participation as a proxy for traditional values (Van Ham & Büchel, 2006). We expect that religiosity increases the likelihood of gendered working and commuting arrangements, especially the likelihood of a female small part time arrangement and the traditional male breadwinner model.…”
Section: Other Background Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This spatial concentration of more traditional values might obscure effects from the residential context that have our primary interest. Religiosity is commonly used in models of female labour force participation as a proxy for traditional values (Van Ham & Büchel, 2006). We expect that religiosity increases the likelihood of gendered working and commuting arrangements, especially the likelihood of a female small part time arrangement and the traditional male breadwinner model.…”
Section: Other Background Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Starting with labor market characteristics, van Ham and Büchel (2006) observe that mothers are more likely to work if they are living in a region with a low unemployment rate, meaning a high job availability. They argue that high unemployment rates serve as a discouragement to even enter the labor market.…”
Section: Factors Influencing Maternal Employmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies investigated that there is a positive impact of child care availability on maternal employment ( (Spieß & Büchel, 2003), (Van Ham & Büchel, 2006)). A positive significant impact can, however, just be observed by inclusion of fullday care opposed to half-day care as often the inflexibility of opening hours of these institutions even prevent mothers to take a part-time employment (Kreyenfeld & Hank, 2000).…”
Section: Factors Influencing Maternal Employmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, even their spatial mobility is comparatively more limited [Weinberg, Reagan and Yankow 2004], and one can show that more women work closer to home (possibly because they take on a larger share of domestic parental responsibilities). 7 Using the subsample of women who live in Western Germany and are willing to work available in the German Socio-Economic Panel (SOEP), van Ham and Büchel [2006] find that women living in an area with a high unemployment rate are discouraged from entering the labor market.…”
Section: Female Labor Supplymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Labor Economics, empirical studies mainly focus on how neighbors influence individual employment probabilities [Bauer, Fertig and Vorell 2011;Ioannides and Loury 2004] and welfare receipt [Kling, Liebman and Katz 2007]. Studies specifically addressing neighborhood effects on womens' individual labor supply remain scarce, but a few notable examples are available [van Ham and Büchel 2006;Johnson 2014;Maurin and Moschion 2009]. Manski [1993] provides the conventional organizing framework, where there are three neighborhood effects to consider.…”
Section: Link Between Labor-market Outcomes and Neighborhood Attributesmentioning
confidence: 99%