2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.optlastec.2021.107029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Unwrapping the laser beam quality through nonlinear time series and fractal analyses: A surrogate approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Typical laser parameters, such as beam width, β factor, and M 2 factor, can be obtained by measuring the intensity distribution of one or more axial cross-section spots [ 1 , 2 , 3 ]. When the spot is large, the measurement system prioritizes the array target composed of attenuation and detection units [ 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 ]. The system always has a large aperture, and the calibration of the whole target can conveniently correct the inconsistent responsivity of sampling units.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Typical laser parameters, such as beam width, β factor, and M 2 factor, can be obtained by measuring the intensity distribution of one or more axial cross-section spots [ 1 , 2 , 3 ]. When the spot is large, the measurement system prioritizes the array target composed of attenuation and detection units [ 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 ]. The system always has a large aperture, and the calibration of the whole target can conveniently correct the inconsistent responsivity of sampling units.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, its resolution is often limited by the complex unit design. Moreover, the transmittance and response of the units are sensitive to the incident angle in many applications [ 5 , 6 , 7 ], which is regarded as a significant error source. Since there are frequently variable and unmeasurable skew angles between the beam and the receiving system caused by alignment error, the measurement is expected to be only related to the incident energy, not the incident angle.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%