2015
DOI: 10.1039/c5dt00180c
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

[UO2(NH3)5]Br2·NH3: synthesis, crystal structure, and speciation in liquid ammonia solution by first-principles molecular dynamics simulations

Abstract: Additional Computational Details PCM and NBO calculationsStarting from the gas-phase BLYP/SDD/6-311+G** equilibrium structures, [UO 2 L 5 ] 2+ (L = H 2 O, NH 3 ) were re-optimised using the polarisable continuum model in its integral equation formalism (IEF-PCM), 1 as implemented in Gaussian 09. 2 For L = H 2 O, standard solvent parameters of water were used, for ammonia we employed the static dielectric constant of liquid ammonia at 20ºC ( = 16.6), 3 the same dynamic dielectric constant as water, 4 and a sol… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
19
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

5
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
3
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These hydrogen bonds for the different decaammine thorium(IV) halides are in good agreement with known N−H⋅⋅⋅ X ( X= Cl, Br, I) hydrogen bonds for example in [Co(NH 3 ) 6 ]Cl 2 (3.601 Å, T =294 K), [Co(NH 3 ) 6 ]Br(S 2 O 3 ) ⋅ H 2 O (3.509(4) to 3.539(3) Å, T =295 K) or [CoCO 3 (NH 3 ) 5 ]Br ⋅ H 2 O (3.41 to 3.63 Å), or [Co(NH 3 ) 6 ]I 3 (3.902 Å, T =298 K) [10,31‐36] …”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 84%
“…These hydrogen bonds for the different decaammine thorium(IV) halides are in good agreement with known N−H⋅⋅⋅ X ( X= Cl, Br, I) hydrogen bonds for example in [Co(NH 3 ) 6 ]Cl 2 (3.601 Å, T =294 K), [Co(NH 3 ) 6 ]Br(S 2 O 3 ) ⋅ H 2 O (3.509(4) to 3.539(3) Å, T =295 K) or [CoCO 3 (NH 3 ) 5 ]Br ⋅ H 2 O (3.41 to 3.63 Å), or [Co(NH 3 ) 6 ]I 3 (3.902 Å, T =298 K) [10,31‐36] …”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Br 2 ÁNH 3 , U-O distances in the range 1.768 (2) to 1.771 (3) Å were reported (Woidy et al, 2012(Woidy et al, , 2015b; these are shortened by ca 0.1 Å compared to the uranyl ion presented here.…”
Section: Results and Discussion -Structural Commentarymentioning
confidence: 43%
“…For the calculations, the ωB97xD functional by Head-Gordon and basis sets from the def2-family by Weigend and Ahlrichs were employed. Numerical integrations were performed on an ultrafine grid, and solvent effects were included by using a PCM model as implemented in the Gaussian package and employing the same solvent parameters for ammonia as described elsewhere . Energy-optimization of molecular structures and harmonic vibrational analyses were carried out at the PCM-ωB97xD/def2-tzvp level without symmetry constraints, and magnetic shieldings were then calculated for the final geometries at the PCM-ωB97xD/def2-tzvpp level.…”
Section: Experimental Sectionmentioning
confidence: 99%