“…However, diffusional limitations due to the micropores and faster catalytic deactivation among the existing challenges, similar to many other zeolites catalyzed processes discussed in this review. The different zeolites have been screened for the valorization of plastic waste, including zeolite Y, ZSM-5, beta, natural zeolites, and fluid catalyzed cracking (FCC) catalysts, which preferentially yield gasoline and diesel-ranged hydrocarbons with lower olefin content, light olefins and aromatics, gaseous products with reduced liquid fraction, (relatively unselective) liquid and gaseous products, and liquid oils, respectively. ,− In the case of doped zeolites, the preferential product selectivity depends on the type of metals and metal–support interactions based on the dispersion of metal: for example, the addition of Ni into zeolite favored the formation of shorter olefinic species, while iron doping on ZSM-5 improved the yield of monoaromatic species. , Similarly, activating hydrogen by Pd over Pd-doped zeolites promoted hydrogenation, dehydrogenation, and hydro-isomerization reactions to preferentially deliver saturated hydrocarbons. , Herein, we refer to three recent reviews on this topic, where the status of the current literature on plastic waste valorization over zeolite/heterogeneous catalysts has been appropriately discussed. ,, Although the carbenium-based mechanistic proposal seems reasonable in the zeolite-mediated plastic valorization, their experimental evidence is scarce. Herein, this research field could draw inspiration from the zeolite-catalyzed biomass conversion to deliver precise mechanistic information, which could be helpful in maturing this chemical reaction.…”