Update of dialysis initiation timing in end stage kidney disease patients: is it a resolved question? A systematic literature review

Abstract

Background The exact optimal timing of dialysis for ESKD patients remains unknown. This study systematically reviewed the available evidence with regard to the optimal initiation of maintenance dialysis in ESKD patients. Methods An electronic search was performed in Embase, PubMed and the Cochrane Library in order to find studies investigating associations between variables reference to “start of dialysis” and outcomes. Quality assessment and bias assessment were performed by the Newcastle–Ottawa scale and the ROBINSI tool. Due to the heterogeneity of studies, a meta-analysis could not be performed. Results Thirteen studies were included; four studies included only haemodialysis patients, three peritoneal dialysis, six both; study outcomes included mortality, cardiovascular events, technique failure, quality of life and others. Nine studies mainly focused on the optimal GFR of maintenance dialysis initiation; five studies showed none association between GFR and mortality or other adverse outcomes, two studies showed dialysis initiation at higher GFR levels were with poor prognosis, and 2 studies showed higher GFR levels with better prognosis. Three studies paid attention to comprehensive assessment of uremic signs and/or symptoms for optimal dialysis initiation; uremic burden based on 7 uremic indicators (hemoglobin, serum albumin, blood urea nitrogen, serum creatinine, potassium, phosphorus, and bicarbonate) were not associated with mortality; another equation (combination of sex, age, serum creatinine, blood urea nitrogen, serum albumin, haemoglobin, serum phosphorus, diabetes mellitus, and heart failure) based on fuzzy mathematics to assess the timing of haemodialysis initiation was accuracy to prognose 3-year survival; the third study found that volume overload or hypertension was associated with the highest risk for subsequent mortality. Two studies compared urgent or optimal start in dialysis, a study reported increased survival in optimal start patients, another reported no differences between Urgent-Start-PD and Early-Start-PD regarding 6-month outcomes. Limitations: Heterogeneity among the studies was quite high, with differences in sample size, variable and group characteristics; no RCT studies were included, which weakened the strength of evidences. Conclusions The criteria for dialysis initiation were varied. Most studies proved that GFR at dialysis initiation was not associated with mortality, timing of dialysis initiation should not be based on GFR, assessments of volume load and patient’s tolerance to volume overload are prospective approaches.

Membranous nephropathy: pathogenesis and treatments

“…Choosing the appropriate timing of dialysis requires not only consideration of the patient's GFR, but also customization to the individual needs of the patient in terms of age, gender, comorbidities (diabetes, hypertension, etc. ), and physical condition 234–236 …”

A paper-based dual functional biosensor for safe and user-friendly point-of-care urine analysis

“…During its early stages, most patients remain asymptomatic, until they reach the end stage when dialysis treatments become necessary. 1 Recently studies have reported the diagnosis of CKD using relatively easily measurable urinary biomarkers such as pH and glucose 2,3 instead of the conventional analysis of glomerular filtration rate or blood albumin concentration. 4,5 However, their accurate analysis relies on sending the samples to laboratories, where dedicated equipment and skilled personnel are required.…”