2018
DOI: 10.1111/imj.14063
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Update on diagnosis and anticoagulant therapy for venous thromboembolism

Abstract: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) continues to be a common medical problem requiring the need for rapid treatment with anticoagulant therapy. Until the recent availability of the direct oral anticoagulants for treatment of VTE, the option for oral anticoagulation was limited to warfarin therapy. The addition of these new medications has been welcomed, but has led to added complexities in deciding the most appropriate agent for each patient based on individual risk factors. Furthermore, there are several circumstanc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…DVT was diagnosed with ultrasound with Doppler, and PE was diagnosed with a CT scan performed in a PE specific protocol. Both these modalities are standard for establishing a VTE diagnosis [27, 28].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DVT was diagnosed with ultrasound with Doppler, and PE was diagnosed with a CT scan performed in a PE specific protocol. Both these modalities are standard for establishing a VTE diagnosis [27, 28].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, these data suggest that the PERC may not be a beneficial diagnostic step when evaluating acutely and/or chronically ill hospitalized patients with risk factors and/or symptoms suggestive of PE (eg, age ≥50 years, recent surgery or trauma, SaO 2 <95%, and tachycardia). 15,[37][38][39] Additional prospective research with a larger sample of heterogeneous inpatients being evaluated for PE diagnosis is needed to appraise the clinical utility of the PERC in the hospitalized patient population.…”
Section: Use Of a Validated Clinical Decision Rulementioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is a wealth of literature about tools to assess whether to test for venous thromboembolism and whether to admit. These are discussed in detail in two recent articles from Internal Medicine Journal . I must confess that I do not consciously use any of them, relying on clinical ‘gestalt’ after years of practising in the field.…”
Section: Playing Patientmentioning
confidence: 99%