2019
DOI: 10.1111/1756-185x.13744
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Update on recommendations for eligibility of government subsidization of biologic disease‐modifying antirheumatic drugs for the treatment of axial spondyloarthritis in Singapore

Abstract: Aims The field of axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) has undergone significant changes recently in particular with disease classification, assessment of disease activity and increased treatment options for biologics. In order to reflect these developments, we aimed to update the local consensus recommendations for subsidization of biologics. Methods A modified Delphi approach was used. Six published guidelines from major rheumatology societies and healthcare authorities on axSpA were reviewed. Findings were synth… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
(136 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At present, there are no head-to-head comparative studies available on TNF inhibitors versus IL-17A inhibitors for the treatment of AS, but guidelines from both China and abroad recommended that TNF inhibitors or IL-17A inhibitors can be used without preference of one over another after NSAIDs failure. [ 29 , 30 ] TNF inhibitors and IL-17A inhibitors have been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of nr-ax-SpA, but not yet in China.…”
Section: Consensusmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At present, there are no head-to-head comparative studies available on TNF inhibitors versus IL-17A inhibitors for the treatment of AS, but guidelines from both China and abroad recommended that TNF inhibitors or IL-17A inhibitors can be used without preference of one over another after NSAIDs failure. [ 29 , 30 ] TNF inhibitors and IL-17A inhibitors have been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of nr-ax-SpA, but not yet in China.…”
Section: Consensusmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fourth, if the referring physician was not fully aware of the abovedescribed differences between classification and diagnosis, recording the MRI scan as ASAS-positive or ASAS-negative might be interpreted as a diagnostic statement. Fifth, in some countries, the indication for prescribing certain drugs depends on ASAS or mNYC positivity [39]. Legal problems could occur if, for example, an insurance provider links the approval of a certain therapy to classification and the radiology report states a different opinion from the conclusion of the rheumatologist [40].…”
Section: Should I Report Asas Positivity In Clinical Mri?mentioning
confidence: 99%