2024
DOI: 10.1099/ijsem.0.006300
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Update on the proposed minimal standards for the use of genome data for the taxonomy of prokaryotes

Raúl Riesco,
Martha E. Trujillo

Abstract: The field of microbial taxonomy is dynamic, aiming to provide a stable and contemporary classification system for prokaryotes. Traditionally, reliance on phenotypic characteristics limited the comprehensive understanding of microbial diversity and evolution. The introduction of molecular techniques, particularly DNA sequencing and genomics, has transformed our perception of prokaryotic diversity. In the past two decades, advancements in genome sequencing have transitioned from traditional methods to a genome-b… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 79 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…hygroscopicus NBRC 13472 T , which were 91.26 and 48%, respectively ( Table 5 ). These values were below the novel species threshold of 95% (ANI) and 70% (dDDH) ( Meier-Kolthoff et al, 2022 ; Riesco and Trujillo, 2024 ). These findings further supported that strain SCA4-21 T belongs to a novel species in the genus Streptomyces .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…hygroscopicus NBRC 13472 T , which were 91.26 and 48%, respectively ( Table 5 ). These values were below the novel species threshold of 95% (ANI) and 70% (dDDH) ( Meier-Kolthoff et al, 2022 ; Riesco and Trujillo, 2024 ). These findings further supported that strain SCA4-21 T belongs to a novel species in the genus Streptomyces .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…The overall genome-related indexes (OGRI), such as ANI and dDDH, have been widely used to replace the traditional DDH to identify different species ( Richter and Rosselló-Móra, 2009 ; Zhang et al, 2019 ; Meier-Kolthoff et al, 2022 ). The ANI and dDDH values for accepted species boundary are around 95–96 and 70%, respectively ( Riesco and Trujillo, 2024 ). In this study, ANI and dDDH values were calculated between strain SCA4-21 T and the adjacent seven strains in the phylogenetic trees of the 16S rRNA gene or MLSA.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is critical to note that the choice of reference genomes is vital for the classification and nomenclature of new species. Consequent to the International Code of Nomenclature of Prokaryotes (ICNP) and the current standard for the use of genome data for the taxonomy of prokaryotes [ 53 , 62 , 63 ], analyses for new taxa should include genomes of effectively published type strains with validly published name. Non-type strain genomes may serve only as comparative references and should not be used as references for taxa delineation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The pairwise relatedness between strain PraFG1 T and other species belonging to the genus Psychrobacter was estimated by calculating the average nucleotide identity (ANI) using the EzBioCloud ANI calculator (www.ezbiocloud.net/tools/ani, last accessed on 26 January 2024) [21], assuming an identity below 95 % to indicate a new species according to the currently adopted standards [28]. The chromosome sequences of eight Psychrobacter strains, available on the GenBank database, were compared to the chromosome sequence of strain PraFG1 T , obtaining values ranging from 78.1 % [ P. sanguinis DSM 23635 T (NZ_CP085990)] to 72.1 % [ Psychrobacter urativorans R310.10B (NZ_CP012678)].…”
Section: Genome Featuresmentioning
confidence: 99%