1981
DOI: 10.1016/s0161-6420(81)35014-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Update Report on Intraocular Lenses

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1983
1983
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In several other reviews from this time period, however, keratoconus was a leading indication for penetrating keratoplasty, and it incidence was noted to be rising by the close of the decade [5][6][7].…”
Section: -1990mentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In several other reviews from this time period, however, keratoconus was a leading indication for penetrating keratoplasty, and it incidence was noted to be rising by the close of the decade [5][6][7].…”
Section: -1990mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Prior to 1980, most surgeons had been trained to leave patients aphakic. Only 177,000 lenses of four different classes were implanted in 1979 [7]; in contrast, in 1983 alone, 409,000 intraocular lenses were implanted [8]. As the new lenses became more in vogue and patient outcomes improved, the drive to place intraocular lenses grew.…”
Section: -1990mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In February 1978, national studies of IOLs were begun under investigational device exemption (IDES), approved by the FDA, to determine the safety and effectiveness of the IOL as a medical device for the correction of aphakia. 1- 3 The purpose of this report is to present information on the numbers, the types, and the current usage trends of the IOLs being implanted in the United States, and to provide data on those lenses that have been reviewed by the Ophthalmic Device Section of the FDA Ophthalmic; Ear, Nose, Throat; and Dental Devices Panel of the Office of Medical Devices, and have been recommended for premarket approval as being safe and effective. approved IDE.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%