Update to the difficulties in diagnostic and therapeutic management of the rare carpometacarpal joint II-V dislocation injuries: Case presentation and review of literature

Schmidt, Ingo

doi:10.15761/tec.1000209

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 27 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…This consensus is based on the predetermined joint anatomy which reveals a higher stability in the CMCJs II/III (i.e. stable amphiarthroses) compared to the CMCJs IV/V [45,46]. If a placement of the ulnar-sided screw into the 4th metacarpal would become necessary then the CMCJ IV arthrodesis should be considered with the use of bone graft.…”

Section: Shortcomings and Features In Designmentioning

confidence: 99%

Total Wrist Replacement: State of the Art, Challenges and Pitfalls: A Comparative Review

Schmidt¹

2022

Arch Clin Trials

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background Total wrist replacement (TWR) as motion-preserving procedure continues to be critically discussed in the literature, although the complication rates have been significantly reduced with the current 3rd generation designs compared with older types. Possible reasons for this are often also a lack of knowledge about the currently available evidence, the complication management, and the lack of practical experience by the surgeons. Methods Based on an extended review of literature and own experience, the aim of this article is to give practicable insights for the clinician on: (1) biomechanical fundamentals, (2) differences in design, survivorship and functional outcome between the recent types, (3) possible pitfalls, and (4) failures and salvage options. Results The goal of TWR is that the overall wrist motion is maintained respectively improved despite it works with a locked midcarpal joint. Regarding survivorship and functional outcome the Maestro is (was) being superior over all other types that is (was) based on features in design. There is no scientific evidence as to why the Maestro was withdrawn from the marketplace by the company. For assessment of instability and/or impingement the use of dynamic radiographs is recommended. The problem of TWR is unchanged failure of the carpal components primarily based on mechanical dysbalance, and secondarily followed by metal and/or polyethylene wear, but surgical revision of asyptomatic periprosthetic osteolysis without safe radiagraphic signs of loosening is only required in not more than 20% of cases. For a failed TWR, revision TWR or conversion to total wrist arthrodesis are viable salvage options. Conclusions The knowledge about recent evidence and features in design of the available types, exact assessment of radiographic findings, presence of technical skills by the surgeons, and observance of the patient's expectations are the basic requirements for a successful TWR.

show abstract

Section: Shortcomings and Features In Designmentioning

confidence: 99%

Total Wrist Replacement: State of the Art, Challenges and Pitfalls: A Comparative Review

Schmidt¹

2022

Arch Clin Trials

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Update to the difficulties in diagnostic and therapeutic management of the rare carpometacarpal joint II-V dislocation injuries: Case presentation and review of literature

Cited by 1 publication

References 27 publications

Total Wrist Replacement: State of the Art, Challenges and Pitfalls: A Comparative Review

Total Wrist Replacement: State of the Art, Challenges and Pitfalls: A Comparative Review

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About