2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.petrol.2016.10.027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Updated criterion to select particle size distribution of lost circulation materials for an effective fracture sealing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 85 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…D 10 > smallest pore throat Many authors have studied previously the effects of PSD to the sealing capabilities. The recent work was studied by Alsaba et al (2017) and Razavi et al (2016). Their work was focusing on the fracture plugging during the wellbore strengthening phenomenon.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…D 10 > smallest pore throat Many authors have studied previously the effects of PSD to the sealing capabilities. The recent work was studied by Alsaba et al (2017) and Razavi et al (2016). Their work was focusing on the fracture plugging during the wellbore strengthening phenomenon.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many reports describe plugging materials with high-temperature resistance; these include mica, vermiculite, asbestos, and shell [14][15][16]. ere are many reports such as Alsaba et al [17], Guo et al [18], Li et al [19], Wang et al [20], Guo et al [21], Karcher et al [22], and others of other types of circulation material loss. ese include adhesive sealing material and consolidated sealing material that provide high-temperature resistance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several alternatives are possible (and commercially available) to effectively place and divert stimulation fluids, and these can be grouped into two main categories: mechanical and chemical diversion (or the combination of both) (Alsaba et al 2017;Alshubbar et al 2018;Calcada et al 2015;Cohen et al 2010;Davoodi et al 2018;Droger et al 2014;Garagash et al 2019;Gomaa et al 2011;Kam et al 2007;Li et al 2018;Malik et al 2017;Sau et al 2015;Solares et al 2008;Thompson and Gdanski 1993;Wang et al 2015a, b;Zhang et al 2018). Mechanical diversion can be deployed for multistage stimulation completions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As presented above, there are several types of diverting agents for stimulating carbonates relying either on temporary plugging or viscosity control mechanisms (Alsaba et al 2017;Alshubbar et al 2018;Asiri et al 2013;Bukovac et al 2012;Calcada et al 2015;Cohen et al 2010;Davoodi et al 2018;Detournay 2016;Droger et al 2014;Garrouch and Jennings 2017;Gomaa et al 2011;Kam et al 2007;Li et al 2018;Malik et al 2017;Osiptsov 2017;Solares et al 2008;Sau et al 2015;Thompson and Gdanski 1993;Wang et al 2015a, b;Yu 2015;Zhang et al 2018). Although these methods are often successful when applied during stimulation treatments, the industry still needs more reliable operational guidelines and a deeper understanding of the fundamental aspects of the diversion mechanism.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation