Introduction: Long-acting stimulant formulations are recommended as first-line pharmacotherapy for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Over the past 20 years, extended-release (ER) methylphenidate (MPH) and amphetamine (AMP) formulations have evolved to include varying drug delivery technologies, enantiomers/salts, and dosage forms. All formulations are characterized by a unique pharmacokinetic profile that is closely mirrored by pharmacodynamic response allowing clinicians to individualize therapy based on their patient's clinical needs and dosing preferences. Areas covered: This review provides an update on the pharmacokinetic properties of approved and investigational ER MPH and AMP formulations and highlights pharmacokinetic features that clinicians should consider when selecting a long-acting stimulant. Expert opinion: Since there are no reliable biomarkers that can predict individualized response to longacting stimulants, clinicians need to consider their distinctive pharmacokinetic properties, including the pharmacokinetic profile, rate and extent of absorption, variability, dose proportionality, bioequivalence, and potential for accumulation. Clinicians also need to understand that certain factors can contribute to increased variability in pharmacokinetics and potentially affect outcomes. Less invasive, highthroughput techniques and novel time-based scales are being developed to advance research on the pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic relationships of stimulants. Model-based pharmacokineticpharmacodynamic approaches can be applied to aid the development of novel formulations and individualize therapy with existing drugs.
ARTICLE HISTORYfor the treatment of ADHD. However, given their rapid absorption and metabolism, the therapeutic effects of IR stimulants typically wear off within a few hours, requiring twice-or thrice-daily dosing to achieve symptom control [19,20]. This presents a number of significant challenges for patients, including fluctuating peak and trough plasma concentrations that may increase the risk of adverse events or reduce efficacy; the inconvenience of multiple daily dosing, which may result in embarrassment, stigma, and lack of privacy, especially when administrating therapy during a school or work day; reduced treatment compliance; and the potential for diversion of these Schedule II drugs [17,[19][20][21][22][23][24]. Sustained-release (SR) formulations of MPH were initially developed to address these challenges. Unfortunately, they were not as effective as IR formulations and the reduced efficacy was attributed to acute tolerance due to a lack of a steep absorption phase and a flat (i.e. zero-order) drug delivery profile following peak levels [19,21,22]. Subsequently, an ascending (e.g. first-order) drug delivery profile was proposed to overcome or minimize this tachyphylaxis [21,22]. Based on this observation, several extended-release (ER) formulations of both MPH and AMP have since been developed with ascending plasma concentrations that mimic twice-or thrice-daily ad...