2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2020.10.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Updated Meta-analysis Assessing the Effect of Sodium-Glucose Co-transporter-2 Inhibitors on Surrogate End points in Patients With Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several meta-analyses [13][14][15][16][17][18][19] confirmed the benefits of gliflozins on CV and/or renal outcomes in HF patients, and moreover, some of them also revealed that these benefits of gliflozins in HF patients were independent of diabetes status, [13][14][15]19] LVEF, [14] and use of ARNI. [18] However, the previous meta-analyses [13][14][15][16][17][18][19] failed to evaluate the impact of most of the factors assessed in the present meta-analysis on the efficacy of gliflozins.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Several meta-analyses [13][14][15][16][17][18][19] confirmed the benefits of gliflozins on CV and/or renal outcomes in HF patients, and moreover, some of them also revealed that these benefits of gliflozins in HF patients were independent of diabetes status, [13][14][15]19] LVEF, [14] and use of ARNI. [18] However, the previous meta-analyses [13][14][15][16][17][18][19] failed to evaluate the impact of most of the factors assessed in the present meta-analysis on the efficacy of gliflozins.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Several meta-analyses [13][14][15][16][17][18][19] confirmed the benefits of gliflozins on CV and/or renal outcomes in HF patients, and moreover, some of them also revealed that these benefits of gliflozins in HF patients were independent of diabetes status, [13][14][15]19] LVEF, [14] and use of ARNI. [18] However, the previous meta-analyses [13][14][15][16][17][18][19] failed to evaluate the impact of most of the factors assessed in the present meta-analysis on the efficacy of gliflozins. Thus, the findings of this meta-analysis will further inform cardiologists and HF patients that gliflozins are applicable for a broad population of HF patients as for preventing HF events, while gliflozins may lead to greater benefits in patients with mild HF than in those with moderate to severe HF.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%