2016
DOI: 10.1142/s0217732316300342
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Updated pseudoscalar contributions to the hadronic light-by-light of the muon (g − 2)

Abstract: In this work, we present our recent results on a new and alternative data-driven determination for the hadronic light-by-light pseudoscalar-pole contribution to the muon (g − 2). Our approach is based on Canterbury approximants, a rational approach to describe the required transition form factors, which provides a systematic and model-independent framework beyond traditional large-Nc approaches. As a result, we obtain a competitive determination with errors according to future (g − 2) experiments including, fo… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

2
0
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 82 publications
2
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This corresponds to a relative precision of 6%. In fact, this purely lattice result can be further improved if the normalization of the TFF is constrained by the experimental result [ 155 ] Both results are in very good agreement with other determinations based on a dispersive analysis [ 129 , 152 , 153 ] and Canterbury approximants [ 156 , 157 ], with a comparable precision.…”
Section: The Hadronic Light-by-light Contributionsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…This corresponds to a relative precision of 6%. In fact, this purely lattice result can be further improved if the normalization of the TFF is constrained by the experimental result [ 155 ] Both results are in very good agreement with other determinations based on a dispersive analysis [ 129 , 152 , 153 ] and Canterbury approximants [ 156 , 157 ], with a comparable precision.…”
Section: The Hadronic Light-by-light Contributionsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…Both results are in very good agreement with other determinations based on a dispersive analysis a HLbL;π 0 µ = 63.0 +2.7 −2.1 × 10 −11 [147,124,148] and Canterbury approximants a HLbL;π 0 µ = 63.6(2.7)×10 −11 [151,152], with a comparable precision.…”
Section: Results For the Pion-pole Contributionsupporting
confidence: 90%