2017
DOI: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6619a6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Updated Recommendations for Use of MenB-FHbp Serogroup B Meningococcal Vaccine — Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices, 2016

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

2
93
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 97 publications
(96 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
2
93
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Selection of a 2‐ vs 3‐dose MenB‐FHbp schedule depends to some extent on patient exposure to risk and disease susceptibility, whereby it may be necessary to weigh the convenience of a 2‐dose schedule vs the slightly higher levels of protective antibodies observed in the clinical study following three MenB‐FHbp doses (72.9% of subjects achieved a composite response to all four vaccine‐heterologous MenB test strains after two doses on a 0‐, 6‐month schedule vs 80.3%‐81.8% after three doses on a 0‐, 1‐, 6‐ or 0‐, 2‐, 6‐month schedule), with overlapping CIs between schedules . Two doses given in rapid succession will induce greater responses than a single dose and are therefore more appropriate for outbreak situations . However, a longer interval between doses (the 0‐, 6‐month 2‐dose schedule or the 3‐dose schedules) will ultimately result in a more robust response …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Selection of a 2‐ vs 3‐dose MenB‐FHbp schedule depends to some extent on patient exposure to risk and disease susceptibility, whereby it may be necessary to weigh the convenience of a 2‐dose schedule vs the slightly higher levels of protective antibodies observed in the clinical study following three MenB‐FHbp doses (72.9% of subjects achieved a composite response to all four vaccine‐heterologous MenB test strains after two doses on a 0‐, 6‐month schedule vs 80.3%‐81.8% after three doses on a 0‐, 1‐, 6‐ or 0‐, 2‐, 6‐month schedule), with overlapping CIs between schedules . Two doses given in rapid succession will induce greater responses than a single dose and are therefore more appropriate for outbreak situations . However, a longer interval between doses (the 0‐, 6‐month 2‐dose schedule or the 3‐dose schedules) will ultimately result in a more robust response …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An extension study of the dosing schedule study mentioned in the previous section evaluated persistence of the immune response to MenB‐FHbp through 48 months after primary vaccination, as well as the safety and immunogenicity of a booster dose given approximately 48 months after the primary series . At 1 month after primary vaccination, the majority of subjects who received MenB‐FHbp under a 0‐, 6‐month or 0‐, 2‐, 6‐month primary schedule had protective immune responses against the primary MenB test strains.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations