“…Consider several examples: - Some analysts regard gene editing as a “reliable molecular toolbox” (Bayat et al, 2018, p. 107) to “precisely alter genomes for numerous applications” (Batzir et al, 2017): from basic research to clinical application, and from developing “animal models for genetic disorders” to “gene therapy to combat virus infectious diseases,” and even to “correct monogenic disorders in vivo or in pluripotent cells” (Huang et al, 2017, p. 3875).
- Germline genome editing in human embryos can program cells “for diverse applications, including regenerative medicine and cancer immunotherapy” (Ho & Chen, 2017, p. 57).
- It can prevent parents’ giving serious genetic diseases to their offspring (Ishii, 2017, p. 418). It can correct “mutations in patient cells,” and unique gene therapies can screen out causative mutations and identify “rare genetic disorders and non-exonic mutation-caused diseases” (Miyamoto et al, 2018, p. 133).
- It can enhance the “efficacy of genome editing in the early embryo” and enable the “generation of allele types previously incompatible with in vivo mutagenesis” (Mianné et al, 2017, p. 68).
- Personalized, molecular surgeries on “genetic DNA directly target the cause of the disease in a personalized and possibly permanent manner”; they “could be combined with traditional surgery, radiation therapy, or chemo/targeted therapy” (Tang & Schrager, 2016, p. 83).
- By “replacing the mutation-carrying mitochondria of zygotes or oocytes at risk with donated unaffected counterparts,” germline genome editing in human embryos may prevent a “broad range of incurable inborn maladies” caused by mutant mitochondrial DNA (Adashi & Cohen, 2018). While “no curative treatment for patients with mitochondrial disease” exists, germline gene replacement therapy (unlike prenatal and preimplantation diagnosis) may someday prevent transmission of mitochondrial disease (Amato et al, 2014).
…”