2015
DOI: 10.1155/2015/854024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Updates and Knowledge Gaps in Cholesteatoma Research

Abstract: The existence of acquired cholesteatoma has been recognized for more than three centuries; however, the nature of the disorder has yet to be determined. Without timely detection and intervention, cholesteatomas can become dangerously large and invade intratemporal structures, resulting in numerous intra- and extracranial complications. Due to its aggressive growth, invasive nature, and the potentially fatal consequences of intracranial complications, acquired cholesteatoma remains a cause of morbidity and deat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
194
0
11

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

5
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 192 publications
(211 citation statements)
references
References 141 publications
(179 reference statements)
6
194
0
11
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, it is still the most popular term until now. Other terms were given, including margaritoma, by Craigie in 1891, epidermal cholesteatoma by Cushing in 1922, epidermoid by Critchley and Ferguson in 1928, and keratoma by Shuknecht in 1974 [2-5]. The annual incidence of cholesteatoma is greatly variable being dependent on plenty of factors including environmental, socioeconomic, ethnic, genetic, anatomical, and physiological ones [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, it is still the most popular term until now. Other terms were given, including margaritoma, by Craigie in 1891, epidermal cholesteatoma by Cushing in 1922, epidermoid by Critchley and Ferguson in 1928, and keratoma by Shuknecht in 1974 [2-5]. The annual incidence of cholesteatoma is greatly variable being dependent on plenty of factors including environmental, socioeconomic, ethnic, genetic, anatomical, and physiological ones [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is a slight male predominance of 1.4:1, and a higher incidence of middle ear cholesteatomata occurring in patients younger than 50 years of age [11].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Congenital cholesteatomata, being specific to children have an incidence of 0.12 per 100,000 children [16,17], while acquired cholesteatomata which affects both children and adults is further subdivided into primary (80% of all middle ear cholesteatomata), and secondary cholesteatomata (18% of all middle ear cholesteatomata). On the other hand, the middle ear cholesteatomata are more commonly classified based on their location (Table 1) [11].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Grommet insertion has been reported to be an iatrogenic cause of secondary acquired cholesteatoma [81][82][83][84][85][86]. The development of the disease is quite uncommon, with a reported rate of approximately 1% in non-CLP children with VTI [73,87].…”
Section: Cholesteatomamentioning
confidence: 99%