2018
DOI: 10.1111/jmwh.12922
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Updates from the Literature, November/December 2018

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 11 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this letter, representatives on behalf of the National Advocates for Pregnant Women, based in New York, respond to a study published by Dickson et al in Obstetrics & Gynecology and reviewed in the Journal of Midwifery & Women's Health in December 2018 . Whereas the study by Dickson et al suggests that some advice given by dispensaries to women warning them of adverse fetal effects may be false, misleading, or discriminatory, Lusero et al claim there is a lack of statistical evidence proving or disproving adverse effects between marijuana use and neonatal outcomes.…”
Section: Advocacy Organization For Pregnant Women Disputes Warnings Imentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this letter, representatives on behalf of the National Advocates for Pregnant Women, based in New York, respond to a study published by Dickson et al in Obstetrics & Gynecology and reviewed in the Journal of Midwifery & Women's Health in December 2018 . Whereas the study by Dickson et al suggests that some advice given by dispensaries to women warning them of adverse fetal effects may be false, misleading, or discriminatory, Lusero et al claim there is a lack of statistical evidence proving or disproving adverse effects between marijuana use and neonatal outcomes.…”
Section: Advocacy Organization For Pregnant Women Disputes Warnings Imentioning
confidence: 99%