2019
DOI: 10.1111/bjd.17523
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Updates in cutaneous lymphoma: evidence‐based guidelines for the management of cutaneous lymphoma 2018

Abstract: Linked Article: Gilson et al. Br J Dermatol 2019; 180:496–526.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[3][4][5]13 International treatment guidelines do not recommend any particular order of treatment, and there is a lack of specific data to confirm the appropriateness of current guidelines. [14][15][16][17][18][19] Furthermore, cross-study comparisons have been difficult because of the lack of well-established response criteria, which have only been developed relatively recently. 20 The PROspective Cutaneous Lymphoma International Prognostic Index (PROCLIPI) database opened in January 2015 to collect data prospectively on international patients with MF and to investigate the disease course and its prognostic factors.…”
Section: What Does This Study Add?mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[3][4][5]13 International treatment guidelines do not recommend any particular order of treatment, and there is a lack of specific data to confirm the appropriateness of current guidelines. [14][15][16][17][18][19] Furthermore, cross-study comparisons have been difficult because of the lack of well-established response criteria, which have only been developed relatively recently. 20 The PROspective Cutaneous Lymphoma International Prognostic Index (PROCLIPI) database opened in January 2015 to collect data prospectively on international patients with MF and to investigate the disease course and its prognostic factors.…”
Section: What Does This Study Add?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…International treatment guidelines do not recommend any particular order of treatment, and there is a lack of specific data to confirm the appropriateness of current guidelines 14‐19. Furthermore, cross‐study comparisons have been difficult because of the lack of well‐established response criteria, which have only been developed relatively recently 20…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Traditionally, these patients have been treated with chemotherapy, (i.e., gemcitabine, liposomal doxorubicine, CHOP, and CHOP-like polychemotherapy), but considering the low response and the high toxicity, it should not be taken into account as a primary treatment [15]. To date, allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSTC), particularly using reduced-intensity conditioning, is the only curative treatment, although intended for only few selected patients [16][17][18]. Overall, SS patients have an unmet clinical need for effective treatments, due to low response rates, short-lived improvements, concomitant immunosuppression, and often severe drug-related side effects [19].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Overall survival rates in SS are still low, varying from 7.5 to 22.4 months (27). Allogeneic stem cell transplantation (alloSCT), particularly using reduced-intensity conditioning, remains the only treatment option with curative intention for few selected patients (28). Notably, new options have become available in the last years.…”
Section: Current Therapies For Ctclmentioning
confidence: 99%