2014
DOI: 10.1097/mot.0000000000000075
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Updates on acute and chronic rejection in small bowel and multivisceral allografts

Abstract: Using biopsies and an assortment of additional approaches, the transplant pathologist is now able to provide swift and detailed information regarding the rejection process in the gastrointestinal transplant. This enables the clinical team to properly and successfully intercede, contributing to enhanced patient and graft survival.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With no reliable noninvasive markers, rejection has always been the most feared complication after ITX, and clinical symptoms like diarrhea, abdominal distension and febrile temperature were often seen and treated preemptively as surrogate markers of rejection . Histology of mucosal specimen remains the gold standard for detecting rejection , but it also yields the risk of graft ulceration or perforation and diagnostic pitfalls. In contrast, the skin component of the transplanted AW is easily accessible and can be monitored more consistently and less harmfully than visceral organs during the rejection process.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With no reliable noninvasive markers, rejection has always been the most feared complication after ITX, and clinical symptoms like diarrhea, abdominal distension and febrile temperature were often seen and treated preemptively as surrogate markers of rejection . Histology of mucosal specimen remains the gold standard for detecting rejection , but it also yields the risk of graft ulceration or perforation and diagnostic pitfalls. In contrast, the skin component of the transplanted AW is easily accessible and can be monitored more consistently and less harmfully than visceral organs during the rejection process.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fundamentally, the adaptive immune response, principally comprised of recipient-derived T-cell and B-cell subpopulations, has a complex interplay with innate immune populations including NK cells, dendritic cells, innate lymphoid cells, and macrophages [49]. Our study assessed several crucial aspects involving NK cell activity, T-cell subpopulations, and related cytokines to determine the effect of Ad/HO-1/BMMSCs on acute rejection.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…62,136,137 The full thickness specimen showed histologic features pathognomonic of chronic rejection with severe obliterative arteriopathy, mesenteric sclerosis, and mesenteric lymph node depletion, with no evidence of granulomatous disease. 138,139 At the same time, another CD patient developed acute gastrointestinal symptoms 6 months after transplantation and the diagnosis of CD recurrence was suspected based upon clinical, endoscopic, and histopathologic findings. A few days later, the patient developed irreversible exfoliative rejection that required allograft enterectomy with no evidence of CD recurrence in the removed allograft.…”
Section: Disease Recurrencementioning
confidence: 99%