2019
DOI: 10.1515/bot-2018-0094
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Updates on Section Pseudo-opuntia of Halimeda: phylogenetic analyses of H. soniae sp. nov. (Bryopsidales, Chlorophyta) along the Brazilian coast

Abstract: Halimeda is a genus of green seaweed showing high morphological plasticity. Studies using molecular markers for species delimitations and phylogenetics have revealed cryptic diversity and new species throughout the world. Seven species of Halimeda are currently recognized in Brazil. The present study describes the new species Halimeda soniae Ximenes, Oliveira-Carvalho, M. E. Bandeira-Pedrosa et Cassano sp. nov. to accommodate the taxon previously identified as Halimeda aff. gracilis for Brazil. Samples of H. s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 38 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the range of intraspecific divergence value for tufA observed in this study for Brazilian samples (0-1.57 %) is relatively within the range of variation found for other Bryopsidalean genera, such as Halimeda (0-1.4 %) (Ximenes et al 2019). The interspecific divergence observed for tufA (3.3-16.2 %) is relatively within the range reported for Halimeda, 0.9-12.4 % by Ximenes et al (2017) and 2.0-6.2 % by Ximenes et al (2019), as well as for Codium (Bryopsidales), 1.44-14.65 %, and Ulva (Ulvales), 0.91-9.1 % reported by Saunders & Kucera (2010) Intraspecific divergence within Bryopsis for rbcL (0-0.4 %) was lower than that observed for Halimeda (0.8-1.2 %) by Ximenes et al (2019), whereas the range of interspecific variation for this marker (6.7-11.6 %) is within the range reported for Halimeda, 0.8-11.7 % by Ximenes et al (2017) and 4.5-5.0 % by Ximenes et al (2019). For the psbB marker, Tufiño-Velázquez & Pedroche (2019) proposed a genetic distance range between 5 % to 12 % for species discrimination and, therefore, considered a distance of up to 4.9 % as intraspecific, a higher value than that obtained for tufA and rbcL in this study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…However, the range of intraspecific divergence value for tufA observed in this study for Brazilian samples (0-1.57 %) is relatively within the range of variation found for other Bryopsidalean genera, such as Halimeda (0-1.4 %) (Ximenes et al 2019). The interspecific divergence observed for tufA (3.3-16.2 %) is relatively within the range reported for Halimeda, 0.9-12.4 % by Ximenes et al (2017) and 2.0-6.2 % by Ximenes et al (2019), as well as for Codium (Bryopsidales), 1.44-14.65 %, and Ulva (Ulvales), 0.91-9.1 % reported by Saunders & Kucera (2010) Intraspecific divergence within Bryopsis for rbcL (0-0.4 %) was lower than that observed for Halimeda (0.8-1.2 %) by Ximenes et al (2019), whereas the range of interspecific variation for this marker (6.7-11.6 %) is within the range reported for Halimeda, 0.8-11.7 % by Ximenes et al (2017) and 4.5-5.0 % by Ximenes et al (2019). For the psbB marker, Tufiño-Velázquez & Pedroche (2019) proposed a genetic distance range between 5 % to 12 % for species discrimination and, therefore, considered a distance of up to 4.9 % as intraspecific, a higher value than that obtained for tufA and rbcL in this study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%