2008
DOI: 10.1080/09535310801892082
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Updating an Input–Output Matrix with Sign-preservation: Some Improved Objective Functions and their Solutions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Function (2) is the objective used in the Generalized RAS (GRAS) problem (see Lenzen et al 2007, Huang et al 2008. Minimizing this function implies that we want x ij to be as close as possible to the original element a ij for all i and all j.…”
Section: Total Intermediate Input and Value Addedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Function (2) is the objective used in the Generalized RAS (GRAS) problem (see Lenzen et al 2007, Huang et al 2008. Minimizing this function implies that we want x ij to be as close as possible to the original element a ij for all i and all j.…”
Section: Total Intermediate Input and Value Addedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whilst any of the common optimisation approaches for table balancing would suit to demonstrate the principle of our cycling method, as mentioned above, we chose the quadratic programming approach because the disturbances allow effective handling of disparate, unaligned, conflicting and unreliable information , and because signs and zeros are not necessarily preserved. The sign-and zero-preservation inherent in the variants of the RAS balancing method (and other methods, see Huang et al, 2008) is undesirable because it does not allow account items such as net taxes and changes in inventories to switch signs, and it forces all variables connected to zero-valued constraints to zero without compromise.…”
Section: Constrained Optimisation For Input-output Table Balancingmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The approaches most often used for this task are variants of the RAS method, and various other optimisation methods (Robinson et al, 2001;Jackson and Murray, 2004;Lahr and de Mesnard, 2004;Huang et al, 2008;Temurshoev et al, 2011). These methods differ mainly by the type of objective function that is minimised.…”
Section: Constrained Optimisation For Input-output Table Balancingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Huang, Kobayashi, and Tanji (2008) summarize this discussion and propose an improved GRAS objective function (IGRAS). We use the IGRAS measure and not their comparably well-performing improved normalized squared differences, as the latter concentrates on minimizing large percentage errors in small cells, while it treats positive and negative deviation equally, as opposed to IGRAS which weighs negative deviations (i.e., losses) more heavily than positive ones (i.e., gains).…”
Section: Modelling Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%