1981
DOI: 10.1002/sca.4950040302
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Updating correction procedures in quantitative electron‐probe microanalysis

Abstract: to describe electron energy loss *=-const Z -Zn(1.166 E -) des A J where J is the mean ionisation potential, i.e. the average energy loss per inelastic event. J is approximately proportional to atomic number Z and while many formulae exist, it is not clear which, if any, are correct. Philibert and Tixier (1968) chose J = 11.5Z but an empirical expression (Duncurnb et al. 1969) was developed for use in the Duncumb and Reed ( 1968) atomic number correction J = [ 14 Z ( l L e x p ( 4 . 1 Z ) ) + 75.5 Z/Z"'7.s -Zz… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

1984
1984
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All analyses were carried out at 15 kV and 1 nA of probe current. Atomic number, absorption, and fluorescence corrections were applied throughout (15). Each analysis was performed by using an area scan taken at 200ϫ magnification to provide an average value for the overall composition.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All analyses were carried out at 15 kV and 1 nA of probe current. Atomic number, absorption, and fluorescence corrections were applied throughout (15). Each analysis was performed by using an area scan taken at 200ϫ magnification to provide an average value for the overall composition.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All analyses were carried out at 15 kV and 1 nA of probe current, with well-characterized minerals as calibration standards (Astimex MINM25-53; Astimex Scientific Limited, Toronto, Ontario, Canada). Atomic number, absorption, and fluorescence corrections were applied throughout the study (22). Because of the heterogeneity of the samples, in terms of both mineral composition and surface texture (Figs.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The analyses were carried out at 15 kV and 2 nA using a JEOL 6400 scanning electron microscope (SEM) equipped with an Oxford Instruments light element EDS detector and Link ISIS SEMquant software. In order to minimize the atomic number, absorption, and fluorescence (ZAF) corrections [14], Bi 2 Zn 2/3 Nb 4/3 O 7 was synthesized and used as a calibration standard.…”
Section: Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to minimize the atomic number, absorption, and fluorescence (ZAF) corrections [14], the zirconolite type phase of stoichiometry Bi 2 Zn 2/3 Nb 4/3 O 7 was synthesized and used as a calibration standard.…”
Section: Electron Probe Microanalysismentioning
confidence: 99%