The Blackwell Companion to Organizations 2017
DOI: 10.1002/9781405164061.ch31
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Updating Organizational Epistemology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, abstracting one’s theorizing (by moving up the ladder of theory complexity) can provide the basis for a meta-paradigm perspective that allows disparate approaches to theory building to be considered together as a way to bridge across paradigm boundaries (Gioia & Pitre, 1990; for an epistemological approach [evolutionary naturalist] to unify diverse perspectives, see Azevedo, 2002). As Kaplan (1964) observes, theorists move from observable indicators (i.e., the “individual”) to higher levels of abstraction that involve unobservable categories or concepts (i.e., “social classes” or “society”).…”
Section: Conceiving and Constructing Theories—building Storiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Indeed, abstracting one’s theorizing (by moving up the ladder of theory complexity) can provide the basis for a meta-paradigm perspective that allows disparate approaches to theory building to be considered together as a way to bridge across paradigm boundaries (Gioia & Pitre, 1990; for an epistemological approach [evolutionary naturalist] to unify diverse perspectives, see Azevedo, 2002). As Kaplan (1964) observes, theorists move from observable indicators (i.e., the “individual”) to higher levels of abstraction that involve unobservable categories or concepts (i.e., “social classes” or “society”).…”
Section: Conceiving and Constructing Theories—building Storiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Building on the importance of coherence to a theory contribution (Azevedo, 2002), Shepherd and Sutcliffe (2011) offer the following principles for assessing the theoretical contribution of theorizing outcomes: (1) A broader theory is a better theory . A broader theory is one that explains more facts and, in doing so, provides a more coherent explanation than one that explains fewer facts.…”
Section: Evaluating a Theory: The Narrative Arcmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first part of this section involves an evaluation of the mechanisms as the basis of a BMI theory. Building on the principle of coherence to a theory contribution (Azevedo, 2017;Sutcliffe, 2011), Shepherd andSuddaby (2017) argued that theories with explicit mechanisms are preferable because they provide a clearer explanation by demonstrating how and why one thing leads to another and therefore provides an explanation. These scholars also posited that a simple theory tends to be the better theory because it does not carry the weight of elements that add little additional value to our understanding.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Abstracting one's theorizing-that is, moving up the ladder of theory complexity-can provide the foundation for a meta-paradigm perspective, allowing scholars to consider diverse approaches to theory building together as a way to bridge paradigm boundaries (Gioia & Pitre, 1990; for an epistemological approach [evolutionary naturalist] to combine disparate perspectives, see Azevedo, 2002). Indeed, according to Kaplan (1964), many theorists move from observable indicators of a phenomenon (i.e., the "individual") to higher levels of abstraction that entail unobservable categories or concepts (i.e., "social classes" or "society").…”
Section: Choosing a Perspective For Theorizing: Determining The Narra...mentioning
confidence: 99%