2020
DOI: 10.1007/s10014-020-00358-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Updating the grading criteria for adult diffuse gliomas: beyond the WHO2016CNS classification

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The use of different thresholds for grading assessment margin could explain the inconsistent results obtained in different studies on prognosis and molecular profile of IDHwt grade II and III gliomas and, in our view, represents an urgent issue to address in the forthcoming WHO classification. 23 The grading criteria used here have been widely used in the past and have been adopted by the cIMPACT to separate grade II and III IDHmut diffuse astrocytomas 14 : in the same way, they allow here a prognostic stratification of IDHwt gliomas, suggesting that the same mitotic threshold is associated with different outcome in both IDHmut and IDHwt gliomas.…”
Section: Neuro-oncologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of different thresholds for grading assessment margin could explain the inconsistent results obtained in different studies on prognosis and molecular profile of IDHwt grade II and III gliomas and, in our view, represents an urgent issue to address in the forthcoming WHO classification. 23 The grading criteria used here have been widely used in the past and have been adopted by the cIMPACT to separate grade II and III IDHmut diffuse astrocytomas 14 : in the same way, they allow here a prognostic stratification of IDHwt gliomas, suggesting that the same mitotic threshold is associated with different outcome in both IDHmut and IDHwt gliomas.…”
Section: Neuro-oncologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[3][4][5] Case 2 was diagnosed with diffuse astrocytoma, with molecular features of glioblastoma, WHO grade IV. 2,6,7 Although both cases revealed similar pathologies, the clinical outcomes were completely distinct. Thus, radiological images, including CT and MRI, with a perfusion study of both cases were compared to improve diagnostic accuracy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…The patient in case 1 was believed to have tumefactive demyelinating disease (TDL), [3][4][5] whereas in the patient in case 2, we detected a TERT promoter mutation which indicated diffuse astrocytic glioma, IDH wild-type, with molecular features of glioblastoma, WHO grade IV. 2,6,7 For both cases, radiological and pathological comparisons were conducted.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, most NOTCH inhibitors remain in clinical phase I and II trials, but several NOTCH inhibitors had only a modest efficacy in the initial stage, with an unsatisfactory outcome (48,49). Since the tumor microenvironment contains a complex mixture of biochemical and biophysical cues that modulate cell behavior (33,50), possible reasons for these unsatisfied results may have been the heterogeneity of glioma and the crosstalk between the NOTCH pathway and other molecules.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%