2017
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stx1794
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Updating the (supermassive black hole mass)–(spiral arm pitch angle) relation: a strong correlation for galaxies with pseudobulges

Abstract: We have conducted an image analysis of the (current) full sample of 44 spiral galaxies with directly measured supermassive black hole (SMBH) masses, M BH , to determine each galaxy's logarithmic spiral arm pitch angle, φ. For predicting black hole masses, we have derived the relation:The total root mean square scatter associated with this relation is 0.43 dex in the log M BH direction, with an intrinsic scatter of 0.33 ± 0.08 dex. The M BH -φ relation is therefore at least as accurate at predicting SMBH masses… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
143
3

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(148 citation statements)
references
References 153 publications
2
143
3
Order By: Relevance
“…If we exclude the Kennicutt's sample from the consideration, the average difference in the pitch angles between the remaining sources is 13 ± 14.6% of the average pitch angle calculated for these sources; if we compare the Kennictutt's sample alone with the other sources (by pairs), this turns out to be −19 ± 51%, Figure 13. Correlation between the pitch angle and Hubble stage for different results taken from the literature: Ma (2001), Davis et al (2017), Berrier et al (2013), Yu & Ho (2019), Savchenko & Reshetnikov (2013), Kennicutt (1981), and this work. with many early-type spirals having a too small pitch angle as compared to the other sources, see Fig.…”
Section: Pitch Anglementioning
confidence: 84%
“…If we exclude the Kennicutt's sample from the consideration, the average difference in the pitch angles between the remaining sources is 13 ± 14.6% of the average pitch angle calculated for these sources; if we compare the Kennictutt's sample alone with the other sources (by pairs), this turns out to be −19 ± 51%, Figure 13. Correlation between the pitch angle and Hubble stage for different results taken from the literature: Ma (2001), Davis et al (2017), Berrier et al (2013), Yu & Ho (2019), Savchenko & Reshetnikov (2013), Kennicutt (1981), and this work. with many early-type spirals having a too small pitch angle as compared to the other sources, see Fig.…”
Section: Pitch Anglementioning
confidence: 84%
“…Labeled data-points in the left-hand panel represent all the excluded galaxies except for IC 1481 and NGC 6926, which cannot be included as they have no reliable σ measurements (see Section 3.1). The blue squares in the left-hand panel represent the galaxies which are alleged to contain pseudobulges by Kormendy & Ho (2013), Saglia et al (2016), and the references mentioned in Table 1 of Davis et al (2017). This plot suggests that pseudobulges do follow the MBH -σ relation similar to classical bulges.…”
Section: Sérsic and Core-sérsic Galaxiesmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…In the left-hand panel of Figure 2, we have additionally highlighted galaxies alleged to have pseudo-bulges by Kormendy & Ho (2013), Saglia et al (2016), and a few additional studies mentioned in Davis et al (2017, their Table 1). These pseudo-bulges appear to follow the M BH -σ relation (see Figure 2); they are distributed about the best-fit (green) line, though with slightly more scatter than that of galaxies hosting classical bulges.…”
Section: Early-type Galaxies and Late-type Galaxiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Spiral arms play an active role in driving the radial and azimuthal mixing of the metals, redistributing angular momentum, and smoothing out small-scale mass distributions (e.g., Sellwood & Binney 2002;Sellwood 2014;Grand et al 2015Grand et al , 2016. The number and pitch angle of spiral arms are strongly correlated with the mass distribution of the disk and can be a powerful tool to constrain the bulge and black hole masses (Athanassoula et al 1987;Kennicutt 1981;Elmegreen & Elmegreen 1990;Berrier et al 2013;Dobbs & Baba 2014;Seigar et al 2014;Davis et al 2015Davis et al , 2017. The onset of spiral structures offers crucial insights into the origin of the Hubble sequence (Driver et al 1998; Email: tiantianyuan@swin.edu.au * ASTRO 3D Fellow Cen 2014; Genel et al 2015).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%