2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijepes.2009.03.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

UPFC control parameter identification for effective power oscillation damping

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
17
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
17
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Secondly, they employed DE method to discover the optimal location and parameter setting of UPFC under the decided contingency scenarios. R.K. Pandey et al [25] have offered UPFC control parameter identification for successful power oscillation damping (POD). A relative study with minimum singular value (MSV), Hankel singular value (HSV), direct component of torque (DCT) and residue has been suggested for finding the most suitable control input parameters of unified power flow controller (UPFC) for damping power system oscillations.…”
Section: Recent Research Work: a Brief Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Secondly, they employed DE method to discover the optimal location and parameter setting of UPFC under the decided contingency scenarios. R.K. Pandey et al [25] have offered UPFC control parameter identification for successful power oscillation damping (POD). A relative study with minimum singular value (MSV), Hankel singular value (HSV), direct component of torque (DCT) and residue has been suggested for finding the most suitable control input parameters of unified power flow controller (UPFC) for damping power system oscillations.…”
Section: Recent Research Work: a Brief Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the characteristics of FACTS devices, different objectives have been considered in optimal locations of FACTS devices problems, such as static voltage stability enhancement [1][2][3][4][5], loss reduction [5][6][7], voltage profile improvement [5,8], enhancement of the network load ability [8,9], violation diminution of the line thermal constraints [10], reduction of the power plants fuel cost using optimal power flow [11], mitigating small signal oscillations [12,13], adequate damping in power system network with changing system conditions [14], and minimization of cost function with an economical approach [15]. Although all of the mentioned objectives improve the performance of the power system, considering unlimited FACTS devices by neglecting their cost cannot be legitimized despite the assumption in [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…UPFC is the most viable FACTS devices employed successfully todate for voltage support [2,3], power flow control [4], stability enhancement and damping of low frequency oscillations [5][6][7], reliability improvement [8] and reactive power margin improvement [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%