2000
DOI: 10.2166/wst.2000.0523
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Upgrade of a petrochemical wastewater treatment plant by an upflow anaerobic pond

Abstract: A petrochemical plant producing terephthalic acid faced a saturation of its wastewater treatment facilities due to an increase in production. In fact, the plant has been growing in the last years, and the effluents have been treated by reproducing the original activated sludge design. However, due to lack of space, as well as energy consumption and sludge production reaching a certain level, the plant considered other options for coping with the new effluent flow and organic load. Based on the authors' previou… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, to complement the high global demand for PTA synthesis, it is necessary to effectively treat the by-products and residues generated from PTA manufacturing processes. Aerobic biological processes were initially applied to remediate PTA wastewater (Lau 1977;Noyola et al 2000) due to their efficient chemical oxygen demand (COD) removal. However, known potential disadvantages are long hydraulic retention time, high aeration requirement, large site area requirement, excess sludge production, and poor biomass settling property due to 'sludge bulking' or overgrowth of filamentous bacteria (Noyola et al 2000;Razo-Flores et al 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thus, to complement the high global demand for PTA synthesis, it is necessary to effectively treat the by-products and residues generated from PTA manufacturing processes. Aerobic biological processes were initially applied to remediate PTA wastewater (Lau 1977;Noyola et al 2000) due to their efficient chemical oxygen demand (COD) removal. However, known potential disadvantages are long hydraulic retention time, high aeration requirement, large site area requirement, excess sludge production, and poor biomass settling property due to 'sludge bulking' or overgrowth of filamentous bacteria (Noyola et al 2000;Razo-Flores et al 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Aerobic biological processes were initially applied to remediate PTA wastewater (Lau 1977;Noyola et al 2000) due to their efficient chemical oxygen demand (COD) removal. However, known potential disadvantages are long hydraulic retention time, high aeration requirement, large site area requirement, excess sludge production, and poor biomass settling property due to 'sludge bulking' or overgrowth of filamentous bacteria (Noyola et al 2000;Razo-Flores et al 2006). To overcome these obstacles, BP-Amoco has developed anaerobic treatment systems under mesophilic conditions (35 o C) and achieved over 80-85% reduction in COD in the late 1980s (Razo-Flores et al 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%