2018
DOI: 10.1080/1331677x.2018.1456349
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Upgraded data envelopment analysis model application for total productivity comparison in major airports of the European Union

Abstract: In order to compare the productivity of airports different scientific approaches are used by various authors. Previous research has shown wide application of the data envelopment analysis (D.E.A.) model for productivity comparison. The D.E.A. model may be used to compare both partial and total factor productivity. However, aggregation of the separate partial factors into a single D.E.A. model is still not sufficiently investigated. The purpose of this paper is to suggest the integration of two methods -DEA and… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 26 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A key criticism of the existing literature on the healthcare efficiencies analysis is that it is restricted to descriptive studies, and therefore, their generalization is problematic. In fact, critics question the ability of available studies to provide worthwhile feedback to the decision makers and practice managers to improve their organizations (Amado & Dyson, 2008; Jaržemskis & Jaržemskienė, 2018). In our opinion, the lack of a systematic analysis approach is a significant contributory factor to the observed shortfall.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A key criticism of the existing literature on the healthcare efficiencies analysis is that it is restricted to descriptive studies, and therefore, their generalization is problematic. In fact, critics question the ability of available studies to provide worthwhile feedback to the decision makers and practice managers to improve their organizations (Amado & Dyson, 2008; Jaržemskis & Jaržemskienė, 2018). In our opinion, the lack of a systematic analysis approach is a significant contributory factor to the observed shortfall.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%